My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-09-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCP 08-09-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:34 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 11:23:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 26, 1999 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />drive. The applicant was also willing to construct the second entrance into the parking lot, off _ <br />the service drive. ... <br /> <br />Ms. Randall advised that the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Case <br />#99-10, Site Plan, for the construction of the west entrance monument and sign, subject to <br />compliance with the lighting standards of the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission also recommended approval of Planning Case #99-10, Site Plan, for <br />the construction of the east entrance gate, conditioned on: <br /> <br />I. Bethel College realigning the western portion of the service road and Bethel Drive <br />to provide for a 24 foot wide roadway. <br /> <br />2. Construction of a second entrance into the existing parking lot off the service <br />drive. <br /> <br />3. The applicant's Professional Engineer approve and sign-off on the east entrance <br />barrier gate plans. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated that the way the applicant has proposed the east gate entrance, the <br />access to the gate would be closer to the highway than staff would recommend and the gate was <br />at an oblique angle. He asked how visible the gate would be for someone traveling at a high rate <br />of speed on Highway 51 at night. He noted that the current location of the gate allows a motorist .. <br />to approach the gate head-on, which allows sufficient visibility of the gate when it is closed. He ... <br />asked if how the gate will be marked was discussed at the Planning Commission meeting. <br /> <br />Ms. Randall stated that the applicant was proposing to include reflectorized signs on the gate. <br />She also suggested the use of a sign farther up the entryway to warn motorists when the gate is <br />closed. She noted that the proposed signs will be on the gate and will be slightly skewed for a <br />motorist traveling at a high rate of speed. However, the gate will be visible from a distance and <br />there are no hills or bushes in the way. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked if there was one-foot contour intervals on the west side at the <br />slope. Ms. Randall stated that the intervals were two foot. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked, if the road was moved over according to staffs recommendation, <br />what would be the actual cut-in. Ms. Randall stated that the cut-in would be approximately eight <br />feet. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated that the proposed gates would dress up the campus. She <br />indicated that she had driven through Bethel College and noted a great deal of activity on <br />campus. She had been driving a large vehicle and had no problem turning into the east entrance <br />way at highway speed. She agreed that, with the new proposed east gate location, motorists will <br />have to slow down quickly, however, this was not a deterring factor. <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.