My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-09-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCP 08-09-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:34 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 11:23:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 26, 1999 <br /> <br />DRAFT 7 <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a motion to <br />approve Planning Case #99-10, Site Plan, for the construction of the west entrance <br />monument and sign, subject to compliance with the lighting standards of the <br />Zoning Ordinance and for a new Site Plan be prepared for the east entrance gate, <br />to address the concerns expressed by the City Council and staff. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked if it was acceptable to only approve the west entrance monument and sign, <br />or, if by approving the west gate, this would give automatic approval to the east entrance gate. <br />Ms. Randall stated that the Planning Case could be broken into two separate issues. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked if there would have to be an agreement with the applicant to extend the time <br />of approval. Ms. Randall stated that the approval request would automatically be extended on <br />August 6, 1999. At this point the City would notify the applicant that the request would be <br />extended an additional 60 days. This would allow the applicant time to prepare and present a <br />new Site Plan for the second half of the Planning Case. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated that the improvements on the west side of the campus were very <br />attractive and will be a nice addition to the community. He did feel that additional work must be <br />done on making the east entrance gate safer. <br /> <br />Mr. Humphries stated that the only concern he would have with delaying approval of the east <br />entrance gate was that students will be returning to college in a couple of weeks. At this time <br />Bethel College cannot provide these students as much safety as they would want. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked if the applicant was willing to accept the alternative presented by staff in <br />order to gain approval of the east entrance gate at this time. Mr. Humphries and Mr. Weber <br />requested time to discuss this question. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated that the east entrance gate would be a permanent situation. Since <br />this gate will be a long-term matter of public safety on a State Highway, it would make sense to <br />take the time needed to create a proper entrance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked, if the west gate was approved and the east gate was not, <br />would the City Council have the opportunity to review a new Site Plan within one month. <br />Mayor Probst stated that this would be possible if the applicant met with staff to resolve the <br />issues of the east entrance gate prior to the next City Council meeting. Ms. Randall noted that <br />the Planning Case could be continued under the rule of 60 days. <br /> <br />With regard to Mayor Probst's earlier question, Mr. Weber asked if the Mayor had been referring <br />to the suggestion to move the service road to the north. Mayor Probst stated that the City <br />Council was not in the position of engineering a new Site Plan. He suggested splitting the <br />Planning Case in two parts to take action on the west monument and sign and to reconsider the <br />east entrance gate at the August 9, 1999, City Council meeting, if the applicant is ready at that <br />time. He noted that the Council would be happy to proceed with the option recommended by <br />staff in the staff memo. He stated that the applicant should attempt to make a 90 degree <br />intersection at Highway 51 while still achieving the security wanted by Bethel College. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.