Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 13,1999 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that he wanted it made clear that, if the City were to acquire the park <br />easement property, it would not be receiving the property as park land, The land would be <br />deeded to the City for whatever appropriate purpose the City chose to use it for. At this point the <br />land would continue to be used as a park facility for the mobile home park. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated that she could not understand why the mobile home park <br />owner did not feel that the park property was enough of an investment to do the improvements <br />himself. If she were in the same position as the park owner, it would bother her that the City <br />owned property within the mobile home park. She indicated that she had always been opposed <br />to the City doing a great deal of work at the Arden Manor Mobile Home Park. She felt that, <br />while this proposal would not be a bad option, she still felt uncertain whether it was the right <br />thing to do, <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked Councilmember Malone to further explain his intent in the City <br />making a trade with the mobile home park owner. Councilmember Malone stated that his intent <br />had been regarding the long-term considerations of the property. He noted that there was a plan <br />to move the entrance to the mobile home park to line up with Round Lake Road, which will cost <br />the City money, Additionally, there have been long term plans for running Highway 10 through <br />the mobile home park property, His intent had been for a trade-off in which the City would <br />acquire some right-of-way, rather than title to the park easement. He noted that the park <br />easement would not line up with any future right-of-way for Highway 10. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated that the Mayor had made some important points and noted that <br />this would be an inexpensive way to acquire property, although the land was not useful for <br />purposes other than its current use, He felt it should be made clear that thc City would not be <br />recciving this land as park land. He indicated that he might be willing to support the request. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked why the City of Arden Hills would incur costs if the mobile home <br />park cntrance were to be realigned, Councilmember Malone stated that, if the City wanted this <br />realignment to be done, it would require a right-of-way, Mayor Probst stated that this <br />realignment would be accomplished as part of the Highway 96 reconstruction project and would <br />be a Ramsey County expenditure. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson noted that, in the event that the mobile home park were to redevelop and <br />the residents moved out this would result in a significant cost to any potential buyer who would <br />be required to purchase all the mobile homes in the park. Councilmember Aplikowski agreed <br />and added that this would be a long involved process as there are no other communities within <br />the Twin Cities area that accept older mobile homes. She noted that, per State law, the residents <br />being displaced must be given 90 day notice and must be provided with an equal status ofliving <br />arrangements. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Post suggested that the City Council resume discussions of Resolution #99-27, since the <br />decision to acquire the park easement property was dependent upon whether or not the City <br />Council wished to proceed with the Arden Manor Park Improvement Project. Mayor Probst <br />stated that he would prefer for the City Council to state its approval or disapproval of the land <br />conveyance first. <br />