Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />OF", !:'c' FT <br />" '~{A <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - SEPTEMBER 20,1999 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Mr. Stafford stated that the cost of the pipe, depending on the size, was more of a cost issue than <br />the actual labor for installation. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst left the meeting momentarily, and turned the gavel over to Acting Mayor, Beverly <br />Aplikowski, <br /> <br />After further discussion, and Mayor Probst's return to the meeting, staff was directed to notify <br />property owners by letter of projected costs at 100% assessment plus connections, and schedule <br />an informational meeting to be held at a future Council meeting, at which point, the City Council <br />will make a determination as to whether or not to proceed with ordering a Preliminary Feasibility <br />Report, If, following that infoffi1ation meeting, the project moves forward, the next step would <br />be for the Council to prepare plans and specifications with the water main as the base bid, and <br />other Old Highway 10 repair work as an alternate. <br /> <br />c. Pavement Manal!:ement Prol!:ram (PMP)/2000 Proiect Scope <br /> <br />Mr. Post provided an overview and reviewed the proposed neighborhood approach for future <br />Pavement Management Program (PMP) project scope, <br /> <br />Greg Brown, City Engineer with BRW, Inc" presented final recommendations to the City <br />Council for candidate projects lor proposed 2000 street improvement projects and their impact <br />on the five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). <br /> <br />Mr. Brown suggested that the Ingerson neighborhood be the project scope area in 2000 and that <br />Council consider using budgeted 1999 funds on this project rather than carrying them over for <br />future Round Lake Road, Phase II, reconstruction costs, <br /> <br />Discussion items included street width related to cost savings and standards; significant deviation <br />from previous approach to street projects done on a worst first basis; cul-de-sacs versus through- <br />streets; a multi-tiered scenario with thirty-two feet for collector streets, local streets or cul-de- <br />sacs at 28', minimal streets probably at twenty-four feet with mitigating issues being a subjective <br />call. <br /> <br />Further discussion included consistency in the City's assessment policy with residential streets <br />assessed the same amount based on footage, not width; reducing pavement due to environmental <br />concerns; use of existing spaces for storm ponding, with narrower streets in the Ingerson area, <br />rather than needing to purchase land for ponding purposes; the need to develop additional criteria <br />developed for future deviations; uses ofMSAS funds; use of West Round Lake Road, Phase II, <br />funding and Surface Water Management funding; when to actually begin the neighborhood <br />approach, and ramifications of initiating a project in the year 2000, rather than waiting another <br />two (2) years, <br />