Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DRAFT <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 25,1999 <br /> <br />Anything done beyond simply placing the generator on the sidewalk adds to the size and the <br />significance of the installation. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Beck stated that the building in use by Midway Bank is a leased facility. It is currently being <br />used as a computer operations facility. This may not be the usage years down the road. Once a <br />structure is constructed such as a brick wall, it becomes much more permanent. He indicated that <br />if screening is required he would prefer a cedar wood fence which is significantly less costly and <br />would not have the permanence of a cement structure. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that he understood Mr. Beck's position. However, he did not agree that the <br />permanency of a block wall was a negative aspect. He indicated that the building has been in <br />place for approximately 15 years and is a reasonably well built building. If Midway Bank were <br />to remain in this facility for the next 15 years, a wood enclosure would most likely not hold up <br />for more than five years. He added that the facility has frontage on threes sides and the front <br />door ofthe facility is essentially off Red Fox Road. <br /> <br />Mr. Beck pointed out that the generator will be placed along side the loading dock area which <br />has large doors and is not the most attractive side of the building. This was one reason for <br />placing the generator in the proposed location. He added that this was where the temporary <br />generator is located and, even though the current color does not match the building, the generator <br />blends in this location. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson concurred with Mayor Probst. He acknowledged that the generator . <br />would be located near the loading dock area. However, adding more to this area may make it <br />less attractive than it is now. He indicated that, even if the enclosure were not used in the future <br />for a generator, it may be used to house a trash dumpster or some other use. Without knowing <br />the future status of the facility, he would prefer the enclosure be done nicely at the beginning. <br />He added that the facility itself is quite attractive for an industrial building. <br /> <br />Mr. Beck agreed that the building is currently attractive and added that, regardless of what sort of <br />enclosure is used, it will have to be maintained. It was his belief that it was unlikely that the <br />structure would fit any other use in the future. He stated that his most significant issue was the <br />fact that the enclosure will more than double the footprint of the unit and will make the unit more <br />noticeable than it would be without an enclosure. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski requested additional information regarding the maintenance issues <br />of a block wall versus a cedar wood fence. Mr. Beck stated that, with a cedar wood fence, it <br />would be less likely for snow in the winter time to be captured within the structure. <br />Additionally, a fence would allow air flow through the enclosure. With any sort of screening, the <br />enclosed area will have to be kept clear of snow which will be an ongoing maintenance issue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked if air flow around the generator affects its operation. Mr. <br />Beck stated that he did not believe air flow affects the operation of the generator. He invited Mr. <br />Rick Apple from Alliance, the generator vendor, to address this issue. <br /> <br />. <br />