Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 29, 1999 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Mr. Wilson stated that he had met with the Cable Commission to discuss access issues, and has <br />testified before Joint Telecommunication Committees, He indicated that he has been following <br />the bill to rewrite the State Statute for some time and was concerned by the City of Arden Hills <br />standing in opposition to the legislation before the rewrite is complete, He understood that the <br />City does not want to lose its local authority, however, he felt the authority might be best given <br />up in return for other items the legislation may provide, An attorney representing many Cable <br />Commissions has indicated that, due to the activities ofthe telecommunication and cable <br />industries, he was inclined to agree that it might be worth while for local governments to give up <br />the authority in return for not having to deal with upcoming issues. Litigation cases have begun <br />to arise throughout the country and the concern is that these issues will eventually get down to <br />the individual city level and there will be many lawsuits, <br /> <br />Mr. Wilson stated that it was not fair that the telecommunications field was not level. <br />Telecommunication companies that began as telephone companies are subject to certain <br />regulations and taxes, These taxes and regulations are different for wireless and cable <br />companies, At this time, cable companies are providing Internet access and local dial tone in <br />addition to cable services. Additionally, telephone companies are providing Internet access, <br />cable and movies, These companies are all competing within the same market, however, they are <br />not competing under the same rules and are not being taxed equally, <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated that he understood the Cable Commissions do not want to lose <br />revenue, However, the City of Arden Hills wants to maintain its local authority over franchised <br />cable companies. During a recent fiber optics upgrade the City had received numerous <br />complaints from local citizens about their yards being dug up, The blame for these problems was <br />placed upon the City and the concern for the City was that it must deal with the infrastructure <br />issues. Councilmember Malone stated that he was not sure that the State of Minnesota would be <br />able to effectively control these issues, <br /> <br />Mr. Wilson stated that the proposed Bill did not remove the local control over infrastructure, <br />The proposed legislation prohibits discrimination against telecommunication companies and <br />requires that all fees must be applied evenly, Councilmember Malone noted that these fees <br />cannot be assessed to Northern States Power Company or US West. Mr. Wilson stated that the <br />proposed regulations state that the fees must be applied evenly across the board, <br /> <br />UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />A. Resolution #99-42, A Resolution Opposing Proposed Legislation to Remove Local <br />Authority of Franchised Cable Companies <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that he supported the proposed Resolution for a number of reasons. In <br />addition to the concerns expressed by Councilmember Malone, Mayor Probst expressed concern <br />about the continued erosion of community rights as it relates to State Government controls, <br />Although he may be willing to consider some sort of legislation, he was not supportive of the <br />current proposed legislation on the table. <br />