My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-10-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 04-10-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:50 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:22:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 13, 2000 <br /> <br />D'~t" F T <br />! rd..~:;: i\~.. .. <br />, ".\\ .'"",,\ ' <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />reduced or relocated to either side of the home without needing a variance, however, the <br />proposed room addition Would not be allowed and the deck would be very small. The CillTent <br />homeowner was not the original homeowner of this property. There are no remarks on the <br />original building permit indicating that the builder was told that a deck Would not be allowed <br />from the three patio doors. Other properties in the immediate area have decks in the rear of the <br />home, however, variances were not needed. It does not appear that the neighbors would be <br />impacted by this addition due to the large lot size and no neighbor to the rear of the property. <br /> <br />Ms, Randall advised that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #00- <br />15, rear yard variance for an addition of deck based on the "Findings _ Rear Yard Setback <br />Variance" section of the staff report dated March l, 2000, and with the fOllowing condition: <br /> <br />1, If the structure were damaged in excess of the building code threshold for damage, the <br />variance would no longer be valid. <br /> <br />Ms, Toni Halverson stated she and her husband purchased the property with 3 sliding glass patio <br />doors, which lead to nowhere, and they wish to be able to use them. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant moved, seconded by Councilmember Aplikowski to approve <br />Planning Case #00-15, rear yard variance (23 feet 6 inches where 30 feet is required) for <br />an addition of deck based on the "Findings - Rear Yard Setback Variance" section of the <br />staff report dated March 1, 2000, and with the following condition: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />l, If the structure were damaged in excess of the building code threshold for <br />damage, the variance would no longer be valid. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked whether the structure damage condition could be included in the <br />City code as a standard part of all variance requests, Ms. Randall agreed that the condition could <br />be included in all variances, <br /> <br />5. Josephine East Development, Road Request <br /> <br />City Administrator Lynch stated the Lake Josephine East developers had expressed an interest in <br />expediting an agreement with residents affected by the road easement and construction plans for <br />this development. He added that the developers, Mr. Evertz and Mr, Rekuski, were given a 24- <br />month time period in which to negotiate with Ms. Dee Rushenberg, 3168 Shoreline Lane, and <br />Mr. and Mrs. Wesslund, 3 1 67 Shoreline Lane, for acquisition of their property to the City of <br />Arden Hills for the extension of Shoreline Lane. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch stated the developers have indicated they have been unable to reach a resolution with <br />the residents in question and requested assistance from the City with regard to condemnation <br />procedures. He added the developers felt the neighbors were deliberately dragging their feet. He <br />noted the residents have 12 months to arrive at an agreement with the developer, adding this does <br />not appear to be likely. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.