Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS TRUTH-IN-TAXATION - DECEMBER 6, 1999 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />With regard to the revenue categories for the 2000 General Fund, Mr. Post stated that the <br />significant change occurred in Other Financing Sources. He indicated that the increase of <br />$273,200 was a transfer primarily from the PIR Fund. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Wilson asked what the acronym PIR stood for. Mr. Post stated that PIR was a Capital Fund <br />entitled Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund. He indicated that this fund was where most of <br />the City's Capital projects initiate. Mr. Wilson asked if the expenditures for the new City Hall <br />would come from the PIR fund. Mr. Post stated that the construction of the new City Hall <br />would be funded by the Municipal Land and Buildings Fund #408. <br /> <br />Slide #12, Proposed Capital Budget Summary, explained the General Fund Capital items which <br />are funded by the 2000 property tax dollars. The projected cost of $2,750,000 to construct the <br />new City Hall was included under the Capital Municipal Buildings Fund #408. The Public <br />Works Equipment Project #306 included the replacement of a backhoe at a projected cost of <br />$90,000. The Public Works Projects Project #402 included a planned street project in 2000 <br />totaling $2,243,200. The cost for this project will be split between the General Fund, the Capital <br />Fund and Enterprise Funds. <br /> <br />Additional significant Capital projects proposed for the year 2000 were the completion of the <br />residential water meter replacement program at a cost of $450,000, and sewer line rehabilitation <br />at a cost of $200,000. Overall, the proposed 2000 total City Capital Budget was $6,178,865. <br />This figure was lower than the previous year because the City Hall project was included in the <br />1999 budget, and the 1999 budget had included a large amount of ED A expenditures for the e <br />West Round Lake RoadlHighway 96 intersection Phase I project not found in the 2000 budget. <br /> <br />Slide #13, Summary Comparison of All Funds Expenditures/Transfers Out, reviewed the <br />proposed 2000 expenditures for the General Fund as well as the other funds under which the City <br />operates. The slide presented historical information from the year 1995 through to the proposed <br />expenditures for 2000. The TCAAP Reuse Planning Fund #229 within the Special Revenue <br />category had budgeted $419,070 in 1999 of which no funds were expended. The City had <br />anticipated the implementation of a planned study of the TCAAP site which had not occurred. <br />This planned study was not included in the proposed 2000 budget. <br /> <br />With regard to the Round Lake Office Fund #704, the work has essentially been completed <br />within this district and what remained in this fund category was debt service payments, both <br />internal and to a bond fund. Under the Debt Service Funds, the $136,998 proposed for the 2000 <br />budget represented interest payment on the GO Tax Increment Bond issued in 1998. <br />Additionally, the 2000 budget proposed a transfer of$I,150,00 from the Debt Service Fund <br />#315. These funds were being transferred to the Municipal Land and Building Fund #408 as part <br />of the financing of the new City Hall facility. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson noted that the City had budgeted $2,050,000 in 1999 for the City Hall <br />project and was now proposing $2,800,000 for the 2000 budget. He asked why there was such a <br />difference between the amount budgeted for the City Hall in 1999 compared to the amount <br />proposed for 2000. Mr. Post explained that the City had anticipated the construction of the new <br />City Hall to be a two-year project, with construction beginning in the fall of 1999 and completing <br /> <br />. <br />