My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-14-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 02-14-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:56 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:22:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Memorandum, TCAAP Review <br />Page Three <br />February 14,2000 <br /> <br />I'm not sure that the DOA would react positively to having a separate legally described piece of <br />property that would remain in the possession of the DOA. Mr. Fix indicated, during the course <br />of discussion, that if the City chose this option, he would send this up the administrative ladder, <br />but was not real supportive of the concept. <br /> <br />The City Council needs to make a determination as to which direction it wishes to proceed. If <br />you want to remove the material from the site, we would have to hire a consultant to help us <br />through the process to submit all of the correct reports, testing plan, analysis, and follow up with <br />the EP A. If we chose the other route, we would have to legally describe the property in a <br />different fashion and resubmit that to the DOA for their consideration and approval, and seek <br />concurrence by the MPCA for title to the property. <br /> <br />At this time, I'm seeking direction from the City Council on which way to proceed with the <br />TCAAP property. <br /> <br />CC/Ken Nimmer, Impact Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.