Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />II <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />lit <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />Metro Transit <br /> <br />Sectors 1 and 2 Restructuring Study <br />Volume II: Service Plan <br /> <br />all of these are properly enforced. Full busIHOV lanes on arterials can be appropriate <br />especially in very high-frequency corridors. Of course, these lanes dramatically impact the <br />capacity of the slreet for traffic and parking, and typically require a well-establlshed sense of <br />urgency about the lransit speed problem - another reason for policy operating speeds on the <br />Primary Transit Network. <br /> <br />Again, most of these require leadership from the jurisdiction that controls the roadway. For this <br />reason, policy operating speed standards, as discussed above, are especially relevant for <br />identifying the need for these protections. <br /> <br />AMENITY AND IMAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE PRIMARY NETWORK <br /> <br />The Primary Transit Network - including the highest-volume peak express routes, will- when <br />completed regionwide - carry the heaviest passenger loads at the greatest level of convenience. <br />This convenience should be marketed. New ridership on the PTN is much easier to accommodate <br />than new demands for service in low-density areas. For this reason, Metro Transit can move most <br />rapidly toward its goal of doubling ridership n it concentrates its most aggressive amenity and <br />image improvements on the Primary Network corridors, while also advertising other services in <br />proportion to their potential usefulness. <br /> <br />Primary Services should have a different "look and feel" than the rest of the system. While the <br />buses may be the same, many physical features of the bus stop can help make the Primary <br />network stand out and advertise its exceptional usefulness. These can include: <br /> <br />. Distinctive design for Primary Transit Network shelters, including fully enclosed shelters with <br />heating and air conditioning where demand warrants. Signs on shelters identifying their <br />location can also help passengers to orient themselves, and give the shelters more of a <br />"station like" feel. <br />. Amenities at or near shelters that give value to waiting time, including phones, newsracks, and <br />other fast vending opportunities. <br />. Distinctive signage for PTN lines, providing much more information than the current generic <br />bus stop and advertising "15-minute service" or "the bus will be here soonl' <br />. Distinctive look for schedule information on high-frequency lines. <br />. A new approach to the system map, using colors to emphasize frequency, as we do in the <br />maps in this report. Most transit maps, including Metro Transifs, make no effort to distinguish <br />intense services from infrequent ones. The resulting map is analogous to a road map that <br />doesn't distinguish between a freeway and a dirt road. Because the region is so large, it may <br />also be appropriate to develop subregional system maps, beginning with the Sector 1 and 2 <br />area, where this notation can be introduced, rather than trying to map the existing system <br />using the new notation. <br /> <br />DOWNTOWN MINNEAPOLIS CIRCULATION STUDY <br /> <br />The Metropolitan Council and the City of Minneapolis urgently need to cooperate in the <br />development of a Downtown Minneapolis Circulation Study. Such a study would explore <br />opportunities to improve the pattern of transit lanes in the downtown, which are currently extremely <br /> <br />Nelson \Nygaard Consulting <br /> <br />7-5 <br /> <br />November 2, 1999 <br />