Laserfiche WebLink
<br />unsuccessful. This means that retaining existing habitat is the bcst hope for preserving this species. <br /> <br />A relatively large deer herd uses the TCAAP. Unlike Blanding's turtle, deer are adaptable to changes in habitat <br />location. Thus, as existing habitat is developed, deer populations adapt readily to other sites. <br /> <br />NURP Ponds <br /> <br />Storm water detention ponds are part of modem infrastructure design. They will be considered in relation to the <br />existing wetlands on the TCAAP. Proper sizing and location ofNURP ponds will be important to maintaining the <br />current value of all wetland types described earlier. <br /> <br />Wildlife Corridor Linking Natural Areas <br /> <br />Most of the critical habitat areas in the center of the property are shown in Figure 9 as disjunct islands in an area <br />running east-west along the south side of the kame. These critical habitat areas should be integrated into a wildlife <br />corridor extending from Marsden Lake to the Rice Creek floodplain. The infillland can be targeted for ecological <br />restoration as part of an inner buffer zone (Figure 10). In this way, wildlife areas will be linked together. <br /> <br />On a larger scale, the wildlife corridor will link the Marsden Lake preservc to Rice Creek and connected habitat <br />areas to the north. This will provide important connectivity that enhances the ecological function of disjunct natural <br />areas. <br /> <br />Following the concept illustrated in Figure 10, the land use directly surrounding the wildlife corridor would be the <br />outer buffer. Intensive human activities would occur beyond this buffer. For example, suppose that the preferred <br />land use surrounding the corridor is housing. Different environmental constraints could be applied to lots in the <br />outer buffer than to lots in the more intensive area. Changes might be made in lot size, house position on the lot, and <br />the type of landscaping that touches the corridor. Lots in the intensive land use area would have fewer constraints. <br />Two types of residential markets might well arise out of the distinction in treatment. <br /> <br />Linking Human Land Use on Different Sides ofthe Wildlife Corridor <br /> <br />It is possible that we may want to link human habitat across the corridor. Road crossings are the most obvious <br />necessity in linking human habitats, but trails and even visual corridors can be important as well. In crossing the <br />wildlife corridor the intrusion should be designed with certain environmental considerations to minimize impact on <br />wildlife. These considerations may involve installing rural-design roads without curb and gntter, development of an <br />overarching tree canopy, planting of roadside revegetation consistent with the vegetation of nearby habitats, and <br />speed limitations. Various culvert and bridge designs that provide under-road travel routes for smaller mammals <br />may be used. These concepts should be explored in the site-design phase. <br /> <br />3. Recreational Opportunities on TeAAP <br /> <br />Regional Trail Corridor <br /> <br />A regional trail corridor is being implemented along Rice Creek between Long Lake Regional Park and Chain of <br />Lakes Regional Park Preserve. Plans include acquisition of the Rice Creek floodplain area shown on the resource <br />map. <br /> <br />Nature Study <br /> <br />Camiros, Ltd.lSEH, lnc./LHDL. Ltd. <br /> <br />TCAAP Framework Plan <br />Page 20 <br /> <br />Chapter II <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.- <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />ea <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.- <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />