Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />.. <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />.. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />D. Site Contamination and Remediation <br /> <br />TCAAP is owned by the federal government and is listed on the National Priority List of the EPA with a score of <br />59. Until recently, Federal Cartridge Company (formerly Federal Cartridge Corporation) was the primary operating <br />contractor, except for a period (1946-1950) when the plant was operated by the federal government directly. <br />Currently most of TCAAP is in standby status. Alliant Techsystems, Inc., operates on the site. <br /> <br />This section of the report reviews the contamination issues on the site and how they may impact planning for the <br />future use of the site. <br /> <br />1. Background <br /> <br />TCAAP was used primarily for the production of small-caliber anununition and explosives between 1942 and 1976. <br />On-site manufacturing used solvents in the production of metal shells and anununition. In 1978, environmental <br />studies were begrm to determine if there were a significant potential hazard for migration of contantination from the <br />site. <br /> <br />In 1981, groundwater contamination was discovered in the municipal water supply of the City of New Brighton. <br />Since then, the sources and extent of groundwater contamination have been better dermed through numerous <br />investigations. Fourteen contamination disposal sites have been identified, with the main contantinants being <br />solvents and metals. <br /> <br />A nwnber of interim remedial actions have been taken remove contamination. These actions have included source <br />removal, groundwater treatment, temporary clay capping, soil vapor extraction, soil incineration and soil washing. <br /> <br />In 1991, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers developed a list ofl82 studies and reports available forreference in the <br />Environmental Library at TCAAP. These documents cover many issues, including water quality, groundwater, <br />water systems, reactive wastes, solid waste, PCBs, sewer systems, general studies, remedial investigations, and other <br />miscellaneous topics. Additional reports and studies have been conducted since 1991. It is not within the scope of <br />this report to review or swnmarize all the data gathered to date at TCAAP, but merely to identifY how <br />contamination may affect future use of the site. <br /> <br />2. Existing Conditions <br /> <br />Many investigations have been conducted at TeAAP. As a result of these investigations, fourteen source areas or <br />disposal sites have been identified (Figure 11). Existing conditions in each of these fourteen areas are discussed <br />below. <br /> <br />Site A is located on the north-central edge of TCAAP. Sewage sludge, off-specification shells and bullets, spent <br />solvents and mercury-contaminated crack cases were buried here. The site was also probably used for open burning. <br />Contaminants of concern are VOCs, benzene, toluene, xylenes, explosives, pesticides, dioxins, PCBs and metals. <br />Soit and groundwater contamination are present. <br /> <br />Interim Remediation: To remove and treat contaminated groundwater, a recovery well was installed in June <br />1988 to remove the groundwater and treat it with a granular activated carbon system. Since that time, this <br />system has been shut down and a more extensive recovery system installed. Eight recovery wells have been <br />installed to prevent off-site migration. This system purnps rougWy 60 gallons per minute into the Shoreview <br />sanitary sewer system. <br /> <br />Camiros, Ltd./SEH. Inc./LHDL. Ltd, <br /> <br />TeMP Framework Plan <br />Page 23 <br /> <br />Chapter II <br />