My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-13-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 03-13-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:59 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:23:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />() " <br />l1 F~h '. <br />"'- ".l '} <br />d>p~ .:0 ,', . <br />~ ~~~ l-'" <br />with regard to the two rear lots being held until the access situation is resolved, this must be '....):: <br />rectified within 24 months. To him this meant that, if the situation is not rectified within 24 \., :" <br />months he would have to walk away from the two lots and he was not willing to do this. He <br />hoped tllat tile wording could be changed to say that, if the situation were not resolved within 20 <br />months, he would have to come back to the City Council in order to strive for a solution. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 28, 1999 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Rekuski stated that he has worked with the two neighbors for three weeks and has still not <br />come to an agreement with them. He indicated that the neighbor to the east, Ms. Rushenburg, is <br />very upset with the City Council. He believes that the only way to ease her mind would be if the <br />City Council spoke witll her and explain that she would not be losing anything by allowing the <br />needed easement. It was his understanding that Ms. Rushenburg is concerned that, if she gives <br />up the easement, she will be left with a non-conforming lot. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that if there were a request from Ms. Rushenburg to clarify what an <br />easement means, the City would certainly be willing to do this. Mr. Rekuski stated that he had <br />spoken with staff and received clarification of easements. He had attempted to explain this to <br />Ms. Rushenburg; however, she is still very uncomfortable. He suggested that he bring Ms. <br />Rushenburg to the City staff in order for them to sit down and explain the situation to her. <br />Mayor Probst stated that if Ms. Rushenburg has questions, the City staff would provide answers. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger stated that one issue from the staff s point of view was that, it is one thing for staff <br />to answer questions with regard to Code requirements and expectations of the City. However, <br />staff is trying to avoid having to negotiate what had become a part of Mr. Rekuski's development <br />process. <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated that the condition for approval of the plat was correct as it <br />appears in the minutes. The intent of the City Council was to find a way to approve the plat and <br />the problem was that there were two westerly lots that, in order for them to actually be lots, they <br />had to have public access. The easterly lots were acceptable because they have public right-of- <br />way access. The condition for approval was to allow two years to settle the access issue. If, after <br />the two years, the access situation were not resolved, the plat approval would become null. <br /> <br />Mr. Rekuski stated that the four lots could have access to Lexington A venue at this time. He had <br />wanted to eliminate this access due to the agreement with Mr. Bachman for access to the cul-de- <br />sac. Councilmember Malone reiterated that the City Council couldn't automatically approve a <br />plat that includes two lots without access. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that the City Council would not have approved the four lots if the current <br />access situation were permanent. The Council has given approval for the four-lot configuration <br />under the assumption that the final platting process would be expedited. The two-year time <br />frame was intended to ensure action was taken to rectify the access situation. Mayor Probst <br />stated that the minutes of the meeting were accurate. Mr. Rekuski stated that the City is asking <br />for something he has no control over. Councilmember Malone expressed his understanding of <br />Mr. Rekuski's predicament. He pointed out, however, that the only alternative would have been <br />to deny the plat. <br /> <br />) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.