Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: March 15, 2000 <br /> <br />TO: Joe Lynch <br /> <br />FROM: Dwayne Stafford 'Q). <br /> <br />SUBJECT: March 9, 2000, Highway 10/96 Information Meeting <br /> <br />Back~round <br />The City of Arden Hills held an informational meeting regarding alternates for a new <br />Highway 96/Highway 10 intersection on Thursday, March 9, 2000. Staffhad sent letters <br />to residents directly affected by the different alternates informing them of the meeting. <br />There were between twenty-five and thirty people in attendance. <br /> <br />Alternates <br />City Engineer, Greg Brown, presented the three (3) alternate configurations the Council <br />had reviewed at their February 22,2000, worksession. Those were numbered I, lA, and <br />2. These alternates provided most or all of the possible turning movements for the <br />intersection and included the Highway 10 overpass at Highway 96. <br /> <br />Ramsey County Project Manager, Jim Tolaas, provided earlier plans showing various <br />alternates. MN DOT Engineer, Bob Brown, stated the single point intersection proposed <br />for Highway 96 and 1-35W would be hard to justify if turning movements between <br />Highway 96 and Highway 10 were part of the new Highway 10 overpass plan. <br /> <br />Resident In out <br />Following lengthy discussions between MN DOT, Ramsey County, the City Engineer, <br />and attending residents, it was the overwhelming consensus of attendees that the <br />Highway 10 overpass with no turning movements to/from Highway 96 was the best <br />alternate. A service road on the south side of Highway 96 connecting Old Highway 10 <br />and West Round Lake Road was also favored. <br />