Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - APRIL 5, 2000 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />Elizabeth Garski, 1795 Lake Valentine Road, stated she lives directly across from the school's <br />parking lot. She added that the new lights in the parking lot are a concern to residents along that <br />road as they stay on until II :30 p.m. or later, and are very bright white lights. She noted that <br />residents were not informed when the lights were installed last year. <br /> <br />Ms. Garski stated she would prefer that the lights be changed to yellow lights, which are less <br />harsh, and requestcd that the lighting timer problems be resolved. <br /> <br />Ms. Garski stated that the garbage contractor formerly used by the school picked up garbage at <br />4:30 a.m. and made a lot of noise. She noted that the new garbage contractor does not pick up <br />garbage that early, but requested that the applicant consider moving the garbage retention area to <br />the back of the school to prevent such disruptions in the future. <br /> <br />Ms. Garski stated she has noticed that the road leading around the school on the west side is not <br />gated at night and she often sees cars there. Ms. Randall stated the road will be gated at all <br />times. <br /> <br />Don Techs, 1770 Lake Valentine Road, spoke on behalf of his neighbor who lives across from <br />the parking lot, who wondered if the construction storage areas will be located directly across <br />from their home. He added his neighbors were concerned at the noise levels and large equipment <br />as well as the behavior of construction workers. <br /> <br />Jim Borg, 1812 Janet Court, stated he lives near Ms. Garski, and echoed her concerns with regard <br />to the parking lot lighting which is irritating and bright, and often left on all night. He added that <br />in his opinion the street parking situation has gotten worse. Ms. Randall noted the City has <br />installed signage which allows residents to park on the street but prohibits students and others. <br /> <br />Mr. Borg stated the street parking situation is an indication that there is inadequate parking at the <br />school, and cutting more spots as in the proposed plan does not make sense. He reiterated that <br />parking is an issue of great concern to residents in the area. <br /> <br />Jim Cassady, 1833 Gramsie, stated there is a great deal of pressure in the neighborhood with <br />regard to parking, and the proposed site plan only increases the pressure on students to park on <br />side streets. <br /> <br />Nancy O'Malley, 1851 Gramsie, stated her backyard backs up to the sports fields. She asked <br />whether the trees located near her property will be removed. Tom Fabick, ATS&R Architects, <br />Inc., stated the sports fields at the south edge ofthe property will not be altered, although <br />drainage issues will be resolved. <br /> <br />Mr. Fabick stated iliat the architects and the School District are sensitive to the parking issue and <br />understand that it is a very big problem for the property. He added there is no feasible area on <br />the site for additional parking. He noted that softball and soccer are currently played off-site due <br />to limited space, and the topography of the site makes development difficult and expensive. <br /> <br />Mr. Fabick stated that safety concerns are being addressed by separating the bus and car traffic <br />loops, which is a positive step. He added that some parking spaces were sacrificed to accomplish <br />this, but additional parking will be available in the bus loop for special functions. <br />