My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-08-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 05-08-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:02 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:24:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - APRIL 24, 2000 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Becker stated that industrial tenants prefer to have their own trash enclosures, and her <br />company ensures that they, and the exterior of the building, are well maintained. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated the buildings would be more attractive from the road with the <br />addition of wing walls or landscape screening. Ms. Becker stated there is landscape screening <br />throughout the property, between the buildings and along the property lines. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated some screening is required at the entrance to the parking lots from <br />the main road. Ms. Becker stated the buildings were positioned for visibility from the freeway <br />interchange. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he supports the amendment, but agrees that the enclosures were not <br />envisioned in the original site plan. He expressed his frustration over the difference between <br />what the Council approved and what has occurred on the site. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br /> l. <br />e 2. <br /> 3. <br /> 4. <br /> 5. <br /> 6. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to <br />approve Planning Case #00-17a, Planned Unit Development Amendment, to <br />allow for a Catalytic Oxidizer, two solvent tanks, and the enlargement of an <br />existing dock door with the following conditions: <br /> <br />A minimum of three protective bollards be placed to protect the fence <br />structure. <br />Dock door closest to the oxidizer not be used once the oxidizer is in place. <br />Solvent tank and Oxidizer screening be cedar wood construction painted to <br />match the building. <br />Screen all rooftop mechanical devices per code requirements. <br />Placement of Solvent tanks meet BuildinglFire code regulations. <br />No detectable odors from the printing process be present on the exterior of <br />the building. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (7-0). <br /> <br />3. Case #00-18, SUP Amendment, Mounds View High School, 1900 Valentine Lake <br />Road <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch explained that the applicant is requesting approval of an amendment to their Special <br />Use Permit for Mounds View Senior High School. <br /> <br />Mounds View Senior High School is currently operating on an SUP, which was issued in <br />September 1978, in Planning Case #78-23. In Febmary 1984, the City Council approved a SUP <br />for the site Master Plan, only a Site Plan review process would be required rather than amending <br />the SUP. Staffhas detennined that due to the building addition and major changes proposed we <br />will process the request as a SUP amendment. In the future, minor changes would still be able to <br />be processed as a Site Plan Review. The intention of the Master Plan is to establish the long <br />range vision for the campus, including a physical plan and also specific land use control. <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.