My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-12-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 06-12-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:06 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:24:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MAY 30, 2000 <br /> <br />DRAfT <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />Pay Estimate #8 (Final), Lametti & Sons, Inc., Gateway Business District, <br />Fourteenth Street NE <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated f11at f11e Gateway District project was completed in fall 1998, alf110ugh some <br />outstanding road surfacing items were not remedied by f11e contractor until spring 2000. He <br />added f11at this final payment reflects release of the retainage on the project. He recommended <br />f11at the Council approve the final payment, Pay Estimate #8, in the amount of$2S,710.11 to <br />Lametti & Sons, Inc, <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Larson asked whether 5% retainage is sufficient incentive for contractors to <br />complete construction projects in a timely manner. Mr. Brown stated f11at 5% retainage is <br />usually sufficient for small contractors. He noted that large contractors are often quicker and <br />more reliable, although retainage is not as imperative for them. He added f11at state projects do <br />not hold any retainage. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Larson asked whether the contractor is aware of the retainage during f11e bid <br />process, aJ1d whether other cities hold more f11m 5% retainage, Mr. Brown stated f11e contractor <br />is always aware of the retainage. Mr, Post noted f11at the contractor must post a performance <br />bond that cm only be released upon completion of the construction project. He added f11is is an <br />additional incentive for f11e contractor to get the job completed in a timely manner. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski moved aJ1d Councilmember Rem seconded a motion <br />to approve final payment of Pay Estimate #8 in the amount of$25,710.11 to <br />Lametti & Sons, Inc., upon receipt of final papers. The motion carried <br />unaJ1imously (4-0). <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />E. Mounds View Senior High SehooI Construction Manager, Stahl Construction <br />Company, Gregg A. Johnson, Projeet Manager; Time Extension Request from State <br />Fire Suppression Requirements <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Larson welcomed Gregg Johnson, Stahl Construction's Project Manager for f11e <br />Mounds View Senior High School Construction project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated that the time extension request appears to be a procedural issue, <br />noting that Staff has not indicated aJ1Y problems with f11e request. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Larson asked why f11e City of Arden Hills, as well as Shoreview and North Oaks, <br />is being asked to take such m action. Mr. Johnson stated that the State Fire Marshall requires <br />that the local municipalities be in agreement with regard to the time extension request. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Larson noted f11at City staff had recommended that f11e Council defers taking aJ1Y <br />action on this issue, and asked whef11er f11is would be m impediment to completion of f11e <br />construction project. Mr. Johnson stated f11at a deferral would impede construction. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.