Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Jun-15-2000 15:28 <br /> <br />From-PETERSON FRA~ BERG~AN <br /> <br />851228175B <br /> <br />T-700 P,OOB/OOB F-BB7 <br /> <br />June 15, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Second, the City would argue that because it already has an interest in this portion of Shoreline <br />Drive, it should not have to compensate the adjacent property owners. These arguments should be <br />presented by motion to the District Court before the Commissioners file their award. There is no <br />guarantee as to the result of these arguments. Therefore, in the past, the City has taken the position <br />that it would extend and improve the Shoreline Drive right-of-way only when adjacent property <br />owners dedicate and develop their sites. <br /> <br />The cost of acq1.liring and improving a public right-of-way can be specially assessed against <br />benefitted propertY O\lVIlers pursuant to the provisions contained in MiImesota Statutes Chapter 429. <br />Until the estimated cost of the project is prepared, it is hard to determine whether all or a portion of <br />the costs can be specially assessed in this plU'ticular case. <br /> <br />If you have any questions, please contact me. <br /> <br />truly yours, <br /> <br />,;~ <br /> <br />e . Filla <br /> <br />JPF:lk <br /> <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br />