My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 07-31-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 07-31-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:10 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:25:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />July 31, 2000 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for <br />an additional 60-day review period. The additional review period would extend to <br />October 1, 2000. The City may, with the petitioners' consent, extend the review period <br />beyond the October 1,2000, date. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Lastly, if the City denies the petitioners' request, "... it must state in writing, the reasons <br />for denial at the time that it denies the request." <br /> <br />Options <br />1. Recommend approval as submitted. <br />2. Recommend approval with conditions. <br />3. Recommend denial with reasons for denial. <br />4. Table for additional information. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission recommends denial of Planning Case #00-27, amendment to <br />the Special Use Permit for 1296 County Road F, to allow for the installation of one <br />antenna onto the existing tower and the installation of a new supporting platform on the <br />ground, for the following reasons: <br /> <br />1. The physical enlargement of an existing nonconforming use by an additional antenna <br />is not permitted by Section IX (D) of the City's Zoning Ordinance; <br />2. It appears that antennas have been illegally added to the existing tower in the past and ... <br />the current tower appears to be taller than the original SUP permitted in 1972. ., <br /> <br />UDdates <br />The applicant was contacted prior to the Planning Commission meeting (by phone and <br />mail) regarding the staff recommendation on this planning case. The applicant was not <br />present at the meeting. <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.