CCP 08-21-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

INGERSON PROJECT REVIEW GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS e area is designed without taking into account area traffic speed. By landscaping appropriately, residents will utilize this area for recreational benefit. It is the recommendation ofthe Review Group that this area not only be landscaped appropriately but that design considerations be given in regards to the potential effect on traffic speed and residents' safety. . Street S tru ctu re The original BRW feasibility report suggested that all roadways within the Ingerson Project be reconstructed down to the subbase. The Review Group members recognize and acknowledge that the City must maintain the life of a roadway. The majority of Review Group members recommend that the current subbase structure of each roadway be reviewed individuallv, taking into account the roadway usage, to determine if it is necessary to reconstruct the subbase for that particular road. If a subbase does not need to be reconstructed, the road should merely undergo a 2"- 6" cold recycle overlay, provided that the end product is a road with a consistent life expectancy throughout, which is commensurate with reconstructed roads of the same type. . Lake Josephine Stream The original BR W feasibility report proposed to reconstruct the stream that runs into Lake Josephine by Femwood Court and Ingerson Road. A resident and/or the Lake Josephine Association (comprised of residents along Femwood Court and Ingerson Road) privately own this land. e The Review Group acknowledges that water quality standards must be addressed. By incorporating altemative methods for stormwater fUnoffin the Ingerson Project, the City can significantly decrcase the amount of water flowage into the Lake Josephine stream offIngerson Road. Before any design proposal is undertaken for this area, the City and Council should obtain further infomlation about whether or not tbe area/stream currently meets the needs of the City and water quality standards and the water quantity anticipated. The Review Gronp acknowledges that the Council has received recommendations submitted by the Lake Josephine Association. This land provides not only recreational value but also homeowner market value to the owners. For these rcasons, as well as the reasons cited below, the Ingerson Project residents as well as the Review Group members are opposed to the taking of any of this land. If, however, any changes are made to this private property (e.g. increase stream width by approximately 6"), the City should provide tangible and/or monetary consideration to the owners of any land impacted by the change. . Neighborhood/resident involvement Although the Review Group was not charged to make recommendations about future PMP proj ects, the Rcview Group does recommend that the process be modified to allow residents an e 5 August 17, 2000