My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-21-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 08-21-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:11 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:25:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />INGERSON PROJECT REVIEW GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. The amount of paved area should be kept to a minimum to reduce construction and <br />maintenance costs, storrnwater runoff, and heat buildup. <br />. In the interest of keeping housing affordable, street costs should be minimized. <br />. Overdesign of streets should be avoided. Excessive widths or an undue concern with <br />geometry more appropriate for highways encourages greater vehicle speeds. <br />. Different streets have different functions and need to be designed accordingly. <br />Blanket standards are inappropriate.IO <br /> <br />The Institute of Transportation Engineers have also provided recommend guidelines for streets: <br /> <br />. Street system design should discourage through traffic on local residential streets. <br />. To discourage excessive speeds, streets should.. .not be designed to be wider than is <br />necessary. <br />. Local streets should be responsive to topography and other natural features from the <br />standpoint of both economics and amenity. <br />. The residential street should enhance the community's visual image. I I <br /> <br />As stated above, we recognize that the City of Arden Hills' responsibility to its residents include <br />street maintenance. However, the Review Group members believe it is imperative that the City <br />also be flexible in its proposed projects so that the end project not only meets the needs (e.g. road <br />pavement, water quality, etc.) ofthe City but also the needs and desires of the affected <br />. community. <br /> <br />Surrounding cities such as Golden Valley and Maplewood have also designed and developed <br />PMPs. These cities recognize that although PMP programs are essential to the continuous <br />growth and maintenance of the conllmmity, it is also imperative to meet the needs of the <br />residents that are served by the PMPs. For any PMP project, both the City of Golden Valley and <br />Maplewood attempt to maintain the existing neighborhood design.12 <br /> <br />Water quality standards propOLmded by Federal and State EP A and local Watershed Districts <br />continue to improve and be more extensive and stringent. Incorporating the current standards <br />and recommendation in the Ingerson Project will avoid future expensive retrofit costs. <br /> <br />Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) officials state: <br /> <br />[T]hat areas previously at low risk [to flood waters] may not remain so because <br />development changes the watershed, making unwanted water appear in new places. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />10Id. <br />I1Id. <br />12 Ken Haider, Public Works Director, City of Maplewood, May 2, 2000 Review Group Meeting; <br />City of Golden Valley PMP, http://www.ci.golden-valley.mn.us/streets/pmp.htm. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />August 17. 2000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.