My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-21-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 08-21-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:11 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:25:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />INGERSON PROJECT REVIEW GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Street Classes Based upon Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volume: <br />Access Street 0-250 cars <br />Subcollector 250-1,000 cars <br />Collector 1,000-3,000 carsl6 <br /> <br />Accepting the above classification, the streets within the Ingerson Project would be classified as <br />17 <br />subcollectors or access streets. <br /> <br />STREET WIDTHS <br /> <br />Review Group Recommendations: <br /> <br />It is the recommcndation of the majority of Review Group members that the current <br />widths oftbe project roadways be maintained. <br /> <br />The initial BR W feasibility report for the Ingerson Project proposed the widening ofthe current <br />street widths of approximately 24' - 28' to approximately 32'. The majority of Review Group <br />members are opposed to the widening of any streets within the Ingerson Project from their <br />existing widths. <br /> <br />From the standpoint of safety, traffic, water quality and stormwater management, numerous <br />articles have been written regarding the width of a neighborhood street. From a safety and traffic <br />management aspect, the American Society of Civil Engineers, National Association of Home <br />Builders and the Urban Land Institute have made the following observations and comments: <br /> <br />The width of a street should be based upon both the volume and type of expected traffic <br />and the amount of on-street parking that will be generated as well as upon the place of the <br />street in the street hierarchy (access street, subcollector, collector). <br /> <br />Designers should select the minimum width that will reasonably satisfy all realistic needs, <br />thereby minimizing construction and average annual maintenance costs. The tendency of <br />many communities to equate wider streets with better streets and to design traffic and <br />parking lanes as though the street were a "micro freeway" is a highly questionable <br />practice. <br /> <br />To discourage excessive speeds, streets should.. .not be designed to be wider than is <br />necessary... [because ] [wider lanes] tend to encourage higher-speed driving. A wide <br />access street also lacks the more intimate scale that otherwise makes it an attractive <br />setting for housing. <br /> <br />16 Residential Streets, supra. <br />17 An average daily traffic volume and traffic speed study was conducted by the Ramsey County <br />Sheriffs Department on behalf of the City of Arden Hills on Ingerson Road on August 30, 1999. <br />The results of the study indicated that the ADT for Ingerson Road was 559 vehicles. <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />August 17. 2000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.