CCP 08-28-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

INGERSON PROJECT REVIEW GROUP RECOMMENDA nONS . Residents do not want to see excessive speed on the Ingerson neighborhood streets and this can only be accomplished through proper street design (e.g. not excessive street width).35 Some of neighborhood residents advised the Council at the January 10, 2000 Council meeting that for nwnerous reasons, they were opposed to the widening of any streets within the Ingerson Project. Greg Brown, BRW, has acknowledged that he would be agreeable to maintaining the existing 'd h 36 street WI t s. For a variety of reasons, the majority of Review Group members believe the widening of the streets within the Ingerson Project is unnecessary and recommend that existing street widths be maintained. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Provisions for stormwater management were contained and discussed in the initial BR W feasibility report and included: . Digging up of all streets within the Ingerson neighborhood and installing storm sewer piping; . Curbs and gutters on all streets; . Closure of Ham line Ave. north ofIngerson Road and installation of water holding ponds; and . . Rework of the stream that flows into Lake Josephine. The Ingerson Proj ect residents were advised that one of the primary reasons for the inclusion of a storm sewer was to eliminate "flooding" water that occurred on portions of Ingerson Road.37 A numbcr of facts and issues were discussed at the various Review Group meetings: . The area that accwnulates standing water spans only approximately 300' out of the total Ingerson Project; . The sloping ofthe existing roadway contributes to the ponding of water; . The ponding of water dissipates after a few hours or days; . Ponding water only occurs after major rain fall or spring snow melt; . Ponding water occurs on the edge of the roadway but seldom occurs on the roadway, and if on the roadway, only for short periods oftime; and . Ponding water occurs in the residents' front and back yards, which would not be corrected by any roadway improvement. 3S Residential Streets, supra. 36 May 16, 2000 Review Group Meeting. 37 It should be noted that photographs of the area in question showing standing water were taken after the 1998 spring snow melt. In March, 1998, there was a total precipitation accwnulation at the Minneapolis Airport of 4.56" compared to 0.32" in March, 1994; 2.11" in March, 1995; . 1.39" in March, 1996; 1.18" in March, 1997; and 1.86" in March, 1999. The average March precipitation accumulation for March 1994-1999 is 1.9". Local Climatological Data, NOAA, National Climatic Data Center, 1994-1999. 16 August 17, 2000