CCP 09-25-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. e e e CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 11, 2000 TO: Mayor and City Council Jennifer Chaput, City PlannerCflJ Case #00-32, Variance (OHW Setback), MA Peterson Design Build, 1228 Karth Lake Drive I<"ROM: SUBJECT: Reauest The applicant is rcquesting a variance from the ordinary high water mark setback of Karth Lake (69 feet proposed, when 75 feet is required) for the removal of an existing screened porch and deck and the construction of a smaller screened porch with stairs and an addition to the single family home, zoned R-I (Exhibit A). Backl!round The proposed construction of the screened porch with stairs and addition to the home actually decreases the current area of the house by 162 square feet. The addition onto the house is an additional 229 square feet. However, the size of the deck and steps decreases by 172 square feet and the patio area decreases by 219 square feet. Overall, the construction reduces the footprint of the house. The setback, determined by the DNR and adopted by the City, from the ordinary high water mark of Karth Lake (934.95) is 75'. It appears that a number of homes along Karth Lake are unable to meet this setback as they currently exist. Minnesota Rules 6120.3200 states that lakes classified as "general development" (Karth Lake) should have a structure setback of75' from the ordinary high water level for unsewered lots and 50' for sewered lots, Current City Code states the setback is 75' and, since this is the more restrictive ofthe two, this case must be evaluated according to this setback from the ordinary high water level. Variance Findinl!s In order to grant a variance, a hardship must be identified, as defined by the City and State criteria outlined above. The applicant has responded to the hardship criteria in a letter, as provided in Exhibit B. For this application for a variance from the ordinary high water mark ofKarth Lake at 1228 Karth Lake Drive, the following findings can be made: I. Whether the circumstances for which the variance is requested are unique to the property. There are a number of properties along Karth Lake that face the same situation as this property owner. It appears that a number of the houses on the east side of the lake are, on average, no more than fifty feet back from the ordinary high water mark (an estimation made from data provided through CitySight, a GIS-based program), not meeting the current ordinance requirements. The circumstances relating to this particular property are, therefore, not unique.