Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER I I, 2000 <br /> <br />~, <br /> <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />established. He noted that the assessment rate is intended to be established based on a typical 32- <br />foot wide street and the width of a street does not affect the assessment rate, <br /> <br />Mayor Probst pointed out that, although reconstruction of Hamline Avenue would not be <br />assessed, it would still be the City tax payer's money paying for the project. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown presented the Fernwood Channel considerations and options as being to improve <br />water quality add a pond; landscaping, picnic area, pathway, weirs; Lake Josephine Hills <br />Association's needs; or to do nothing. Staff recommends permanent ponding with possible weir <br />structure used to improve the water quality going into Lake Josephine. This includes addressing <br />the needs of the Lake Josephine Hills Association and appropriate landscaping. The Task Force <br />has opposition to any change in the land in and around the Fernwood channel. If there is <br />something done, the landowner's needs have to be addressed. <br /> <br />An audience member suggested that the proposed weirs should be placed higher up the channel <br />rather than near the lake because the water drains both ways. He indicated that at this time the <br />holding pond is dry, however, there normally is water in the pond. He stated that the rain storm <br />that occurred a week ago had drained into the wetlands. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that the weir would be connected to the wetland via a pipe system. He stated <br />that the interaction between the wetland and the lake would be maintained. <br /> <br />An audience member asked if Mr. Brown had read the recommendations of the Association. Mr. <br />Brown responded affirmatively. <br /> <br />An audience member asked if the idea of a grit chamber had been rejected. Mr. Brown stated <br />that a grit chamber could be considered to enhance the water quality. <br /> <br />An audience member noted that there was a small distance between the existing channel and the <br />wetland and the wetland is currently a large reservoir for the runoff. He stated that the existing <br />run off from the roads runs into the wetlands. At this time there does not appear to be any water <br />running into the lake. Therefore, the proposed changes would essentially be duplicating the <br />existing situation, which requires no maintenance. He asked if a study has been done on the <br />current quality of the water. He indicated that most ofthe run off water comes from the <br />backyards and he believed that this water is relatively clean. He noted that there are fish in the <br />channel, which means the oxygen level in the water must be sufficient. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that a specific study of the water quality has not been done. He stated that the <br />water that runs from yards and impervious surfaces can be polluted. He acknowledged that it <br />would be possible to construct a weir higher up stream. <br /> <br />An audience member asked if the notion of diverting the water frorn the channel to the wetland <br />and then to the lake had been explored. Mr. Brown stated that, although this may be a <br />possibility, the elevation of the wetland is generally one foot above the level of the lake. He <br />stated that the intent is to filter the water as many times as possible before it reaches the lake. <br />