CCP 10-10-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 25,2000 DRAFT 8 2. More than one person not residing in the residence is employed to assist in the business activity; and . 3. The business in not permitted to have more than two vehicles on-site, in addition to those required by the residents, on a daily basis and this limitation is exceeded. Ms. Chaput stated that City Attorney Jerry Filla suggested that if the Council took action on the Planning Commission's recommendation, it would be acceptable for the City to terminate the business and require immediate relocation, allowing two weeks by letter. She added that an inspection could be made after two weeks and a citation issued if necessary. Councilmember Aplikowski stated the issue of the permissible number of cars parked in a driveway was discussed recently. She added that the number of cars parked in the applicant's driveway could not be approved. She noted it would be unreasonable to expect the applicant to find alternative parking. Councilmember Rem stated she had been in attendance at the recent Planning Commission at which this case was discussed, She added that the applicant had commented that she was aware of the fact that her business had outgrown the site and was willing to look at other options. She noted that a two-week notice to terminate her home business is unreasonable. Ms. Chaput stated that a two-week notice was the City Attorney's recommendation and not a requirement. She added the City typically sends a letter and inspects after ten days. Councilmember Grant stated the business has grown outside the bounds of a Class II home occupation as the nature of the business requires people and vehicles on site, He agreed that relocation might take some time and the City should be lenient in its requirements. . Councilmember Grant asked for clarification with regard to a citation. Ms. Chaput stated a criminal complaint would go to court to determine a fine of up to $700, while a civil complaint would result in a lawsuit. Ms. Gulsvig stated she has begun a search for a new location for her business with much difficulty. She added the Planning Commission had indicated that she would be given six months to a year, and two weeks would be impossible, She noted she can rent space for the vehicles on New Brighton Road, but employees will continue to come to the home. Mayor Probst expressed his interest in avoiding the creation of undue hardship for the applicant. Mr. Lynch stated the City typically gives ten days for cessation of illegal activity. He added, in this case, it might be appropriate for the applicant to contact City staff to establish a time frame for the business to be moved. Councilmember Rem stated that this course of action would be preferable and reasonable. Councilmember Aplikowski stated she would favor a 30-day time limit for the applicant to find a new location or provide a proposal to staff. Councilmember Grant stated that a 30-day time limit . is reasonable.