My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-27-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 11-27-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:21 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:26:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />, <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />November 2, 2000 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Conncil <br /> <br />Jennifer Chaput, City Planner Cf/ <br /> <br />#00-]] b Zoning Ordinance Amendments <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Purpose <br />At a joint worksession between the Planning Commission and the City Council on <br />Monday, September 18, 2000, the proposed zoning amendments that failed from <br />Planning Case #00-11 were discussed at length. Since action has already been taken on <br />these items at a previous City Council meeting, another public hearing was held at the <br />Planning Commission and has come before the City Council to readdress these <br />amendments. <br /> <br />Backl!round <br />A number of proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance were recommended by the <br />Planning Commission to the City Council in August of this year. Of the recommended <br />changes, the following sections were successfully amended: definitions; accessory <br />structures; driveway regulations; fencing types; agricultural uses and amortization. The <br />two areas of the proposal that did not pass at the City Council level were discussed at a <br />joint worksession between the Planning Commission and the City Council in September. <br />The results of this discussion were brought back to the Planning Commission for a formal <br />public hearing on November 1, 2000. <br /> <br />Proposed Amendments <br />The CUlTent language from the Zoning Ordinance is provided for you with the removal of <br />language shown as striekeR and additional language in CAPITAL LETTERS. <br /> <br />1) Section II (D), Definitions: Family; Dwelling Unit; Family; Household <br />The City continues to receive numerous complaints and concerns about single family <br />homes that have been converted into homes for a number of unrelated individuals. The <br />CUlTent code does not have any language in it to deter this type of activity, essentially <br />allowing for multifamily dwellings in single-family zoning districts. To address this <br />situation, changes to the current definitions were proposed. <br /> <br />Amend Section II (D) Definitions, numbers 43, 47, 53 and 66 as follows: <br /> <br />43, Dwelling. A building, or portion thereof, designed or used exclusively for <br />Imll'ulR habitatioR, aRd eORsistiRg sf ORe Of FRsre lYNelliRg _its <br />RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY, INCLUDING SINGLE-FAMILY, TWO- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.