My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 12-18-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 12-18-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:22 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:27:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 27, 2000 <br /> <br />D,1\) f~ fLT <br />-_o,ib'\i. i~\~'- -.- <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />Mr. Filla stated Lindey's could go on as before and expand its hours of operation until I :00 a.m. <br />He noted some building additions would be permissible under the new regulations. He added if <br />anybody is not affected adversely, it would be Lindey's, He stated Lindey's appears not to be <br />comfortable with the non-conforming use continued. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked if the state liquor laws "trump" the zoning. Mr. Filla stated all liquor license <br />holders must be treated equally, <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked about the bicycle racks, Ms. Chaput stated it is not a <br />requirement. She noted staff hopes they would put it in, but would not have to unless they revise <br />the site plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated bars should not have bicycle racks. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if the surrounding properties have been notified. Ms. Chaput stated <br />all the properties within 300 feet have been notified. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked what the zoning is currently for the Lindey's site. Ms. Chaput <br />responded B-2. She stated restaurants can exist in a Neighborhood Business District. She noted <br />the Planning Commission did not think they were losing anything. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated having been given assurances that nothing would change for <br />the two businesses in operation, she would make a motion. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a <br />motion to approve Planning Case #00-38, Amending Section IV (A) of the Zoning <br />Ordinance, Zoning Map, to include the Neighborhood Business District as stated <br />in Ordinance #315. The motion failed (Councilmembers Grant, Rem opposed). <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked for comments on the opposing view. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated part of her discomfort is the way the ordinance is written saying <br />these things should be done. She noted that basically they would see non-conforming businesses <br />going out of business and becoming conforming. She added she does not have a problem with <br />rezoning the other five sites. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated the only issue of non-conformity is the hours of operation and state law on <br />liquor license holders overrides that. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated there would be no effect on the properties if they do not rezone <br />them. He noted that if they expand the uses it would affect the other properties. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated his concern with not dealing with these two properties is the Comprehensive <br />Plan. He noted the Comprehensive Plan was approved and went through the public hearing <br />process. He added the plan included these properties being rezoned. He stated he thinks they <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.