Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 24,2001 10 <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked if the county would permit a curb cut there. Mr. Parrish responded he did <br />not investigate that issue since it was the responsibility of the applicant. He stated that e <br />presumably it would not be a problem. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked about wetlands. Mr. Parrish responded there were no wetland <br />considerations on iliis property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he felt uncomfortable voting either way. He noted he did not <br />think he had enough information to make an informed decision. He asked for another 30 days to <br />get more information. <br /> <br />Mr. Sladek asked what information would be helpful. He stated if one walked by the lot, the <br />split made sense. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated from what one could see from the road it looked reasonable, but <br />he was not sure about the remaining undeveloped properties. <br /> <br />Mr. Filla stated the city could extend for anoilier 60 days ifit let the applicant know it needed <br />additional information. He noted the Council needed more information about the stubbing of <br />utilities and what occurred at iliat time. He added they needed to know what was it assessed and <br />for how much. He stated they could extend the time for an additional days if the city gives notice <br />to the applicant before October 6,2001. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he knew there were some concerns about land locking in this area. He noted e <br />he wanted more information on this issue. He added he did not know if sewer and water stubs <br />made this buildable lot. He stated staff needed to update the information on what had been built. <br /> <br />Mr. Venessey stated the builder was trying to get the basement in before the ground freezes. He <br />noted they were willing to agree to an extension to October 29,2001. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated the applicant needs to be aware the council needed additional <br />information. He noted a recommendation to deny the application from ilie Planning Commission <br />gives him some pause. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Couneilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to extend the deadline for review by 60 days based on a need for <br />additional information. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />B. Pay Estimate #6 (Fiual), 2001 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project (Lift Station #8 <br />Reconstruction and Sanitary Sewer Test and Seal/Spot Repairs), Gridor <br />Construction <br /> <br />Mr. Brown explained the Pay Estimate and that all work had been completed. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski moved and COllncilmember Larson seconded a <br />motion to approve Pay Estimate #6 (Final Payment) for Gridor Construction, Inc. <br /> <br />e <br />