Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Mr, Joe Lynch <br />Februal)' 9, 200 I <br />Page 3 of 3 <br /> <br />Sllmmal)' of Current Fee RerJllestor; <br /> <br />At this time we are requesting the following fees and fee adjustments: <br /> <br />t. Rebid Fee <br /> <br />2. Additional Construction Administration Fee <br /> <br />$8,t2S <br />$14,t64 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Potential Additional Fee Requests <br /> <br />As you are aware, there have been many proposed scope changes to the project since bids were taken. These <br /> <br />changes include the potential inclusion of an office for the National Guard, a server room, change of room <br /> <br />finishes in the community room, modifications to the front counter, and the potential enclosure of an office <br /> <br />space on second floor. Whereas these scope change do not appear to be maior items, they do take time to <br /> <br />design, administer, meet about, issue proposal requests to the contractor, etc, It is not the practice of <br /> <br />Architectural Alliance to "nickel and dime" our clients for incidental client requested scope changes which <br /> <br />are made during the course of a construction process. However, we must respect the potential requests from <br /> <br />our consultants for scope changes and will forward those to you as we go through the process, I have also <br /> <br />requested of our staff that they keep track of the time associated with these scope changes, because the time <br /> <br />equates to fee that we can not bill for, and, thus, provides added value for the City, <br /> <br />We vel)' much appreciate your consideration in this matter. Please call me if you have any questions, <br /> <br />Thank You! <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />f4wtU <br /> <br /> <br />PETER VESTERHOLT, AlA <br />Principal <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />cc: Ellsworth <br /> Elliott <br /> Sterner <br /> Cooper <br /> Dowell <br /> File <br /> <br />H:IHQ PROJECTSI199711997149101IiceI020901L1.DOC <br />