My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-12-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 03-12-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:33 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:36:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 26, 2001 <br /> <br />fi!:.r:;> l~~.'. f::~~; < <br />ir~J ,:\_ ,_:c. I~_ h',,"~ "~ : <br />>.,.:.... ., ".""-. ,-"" <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />7. Application for a building permit must be made with the Building Inspector; <br />and <br />8. Screening to be placed in front of the compactor. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />A2, Case #00-45, Scmper (Walgreens), County Road E & Lexington Avenne North, <br />Special Use Permit (SUP)/Site PlanNariancelLot Split <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch explained that the applicant had made the following requests for the property located <br />in the Northwest quadrant of County Road E and Lexington Avenue, zoned B-2, General <br />Business District: <br /> <br />I. A lot split of the property located at 1201 County Road E creating two parcels from one; <br />2. A variance from Section 6 (D) #1 (b), proximity to drive-in businesses; <br />3. A Special Use Permit for a drive-in business in a B-2 District; and <br />4. A site plan review of a proposed Walgreens on the newly created parcel. <br /> <br />Mr. Larson advised that the Planning Commission heard the applicant's request at the January 3, <br />2001 Planning Commission meeting. The applications were tabled, pending submission of <br />additional information, and heard again at the February 7, 2001 Planning Commission meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch presented a list of past planning cases for the Holiday Inn property, located at 1201 <br />County Road E and explained the outcome of each. Mr. Lynch then presented staff's review of <br />the application as follows: <br /> <br />Lot Split <br />The applicant requested a lot split from the property located at 120 I County Road E, creating <br />two parcels from one. The Holiday Inn remained on one parcel, splitting off a second parcel, <br />78,5 I 5 square feet in size, for a proposed Walgreens. The remaining Holiday Inn parcel, as <br />proposed, was sufficient for it's parking and operating requirements. The lot split application met <br />all of the requirements of Section 22-12 (e) of the City Code, division of platted lots ofrecord. <br /> <br />Variance <br />The applicant requested a variance from Section 6 (D) # I (b) of the Zoning Ordinance, proximity <br />to drive-in businesses, 200 feet (from parcel to parcel) where 1320 feet was required. This <br />Section of the Ordinance states that a drive-in business could not be located within 1320 feet of <br />another drive-in business. The City Attorney had advised staff that this business did meet the <br />definition of a "drive-in business" (Section 2, #42) since it offers a service without entering a <br />building and there was a separate definition identifying "restaurant, fast food" (Section 2, #126). <br />Therefore, a variance application for distance from another drive-in business was required. <br /> <br />The following findings of fact could be made: <br />. The drive-in was required for the operation of the business and the property could not be put <br />to a reasonable, approved use within the District without it; <br />. The granting of the variance would not alter the essential character of the District; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.