My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-12-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 03-12-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:33 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:36:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 26, 2001 <br /> <br />LeY <br /> <br /> <br />i:"""'-";f'" <br /> <br />~ ~ 15 <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski disagreed this was the only entry way into the City. She clarified <br />this was one entryway. She believed the building looked fine, but her concern was the traffic on <br />the corner. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to <br />table Plarming Case #00-45, Semper (Walgreens), County Road E & Lexington <br />Avenue North, Lot Split of the property at 1201 County Road E from one lot into <br />two lots, until such time it could be reconsidered within the 60-day extension <br />time period. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS <br /> <br />A. City Position, Proposed Liquor Sales <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch stated staff had been previously approached by Senator Reiter regarding legislation <br />allowing wine to be sold in other businesses other than liquor stores. He stated they had not <br />prepared a response on this. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he spoke against it because he believed the Council should not get <br />involved in this type of legislation. He also stated the City did not have a grocery store, and was <br />not directly affected by this. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski pointed out the City did have liquor stores. Councilmember <br />Aplikowski stated her objection was that any business that was open on Sunday should not be <br />allowed to sell wine. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he did not believe the Council's role was to evaluate competition to other <br />businesses. He stated they had to be careful about approving or disapproving issues such as <br />these on that basis. He stated he had understood Council had agreed to not deal with this as a <br />formal resolution, but he did not oppose it. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated she also understood as a Council they were not going to take any <br />action. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated they should inform Senator Reiter that the Council was not <br />going to take any formal action regarding this. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember.Grant seconded a motion <br />send a letter to Senator Reiter stating the Council was not going to take a stand on <br />the issue of the sale of wine in grocery stores. The motion carried unanimously <br />(5-0). <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant had no comments. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.