My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-19-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 03-19-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:33 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:36:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />March 15,2001 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Councilmembers <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Joe Lynch, City Administrator <br /> <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Pavement Management Plan (PMP) Recap <br /> <br />The following is information that I collected at the City Council/staff Retreat on March 9, 2001 <br />when we went through the steps outlined by Mr. Brimeyer in talking about the process to <br />identify consequences of not addressing this issue; alternatives, dreams or visions needed to <br />pursue the strategic issue; barriers to the issue; and strategies for pursuit of the issue, If I did not <br />include all of the information, I certainly apologize, but this was a summary recap of what I <br />believe I heard. <br /> <br />What is the "what?" <br />. What do we do about reconstruction? <br />. Standards <br />. Priorities <br /> <br />Whv is this an issue? <br />. Most recent failed issue <br />. Cost and who pays <br /> <br />-- Consequences <br />. Neighborhood acceptance <br />. Backlog of projects <br />. Cost of maintenance <br />. Fluctuating costs <br />. Negative view of the City, which includes staff, City Council and consultants <br /> <br />Visions <br />. Neighborhood involvement (after much discussion, it was modified to include <br />affected resident involvement) <br />. Using valid rating system <br />. Acceptable standards, which included: <br />. Strength <br />. Width <br />. Curb & Gutter <br />. Landscaping <br />. Drainage <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.