Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ Agriculture i.~ still the predominant land use in a Jarg~ ponion of the seven county area and a major <br />I contributor of nonpoint source pollutants. Nonpol.!1t source pollution from agriculture occurs as a <br />result of intensive land cultivation and husbandry practices and shows up in three basic forms: soil <br />erosion; agricultur~ suppkmen~ such as nutrients, pesticides and herbicide.i; and animal waste <br />I products. Each of these sources fill area water bodies smothering aquatic life, change the aquatic <br />environmcnt by limiting light penetration of the water, and result in 'the transmission of toxins to area <br />water bodics. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The T""1n Cities Metropolitan Area is fortunate to have an abundance of lakes and ri"e~. The.e <br />water bodies provide the area with recreational, aesthetic and educational benefits envied by other <br />parts of the United States. Preservation of these water bodies and the associated wildlife habitat is <br />a major compon~nt ot' the Council's pl~nning framework. Measures 10 preserve and enhance the <br />environment CAn he found in all of the.. Council's' major system and pcilicy plans. Policy 7 of [he <br />MDIF states that the Metropolitan Council: <br /> <br />supports the'maintenance of environmental quality throughout the region and will support <br />programs or strategies to maintain or improve the nalural environment (page 16). <br /> <br />Reducing non point souree pollution to area water bodies has a number of positive outcomes. <br />Reduced nonpoint ~ource pollution has an overall positive effect on the environment, improves the <br />water quality in lakes, wetlands and floodplains and allows for fi$hable and swimabk water bodies. <br /> <br />Water resource management ha$ historically focused on point sources such a.s wastewater treatment <br />plants and industrial facilities. Efforts to reduce pollution from point sources bas been effective. <br />Nonpoint source pollution abatement is the next challenge that must he addressed to ensure that <br />wat.er bodies in this metropolitan area are protected. <br /> <br />Exlsllng Leglslntlve and Polley Structure For Addressing the Nonpotnt Source PollulIon P.oblem <br /> <br />The Minnesota Legislature <br /> <br />Two pieces of legislation have been passed in the last decade that set a rramework for addressing the <br />nonpoint source pollution issue. However, it will take several years to put this framework in place <br />and will require local governments to extensively revise their surface water management plans and <br />nctivitie.., <br /> <br />Watershed planning legislation <br /> <br />rn 1982 legislation Willi passed requiring Watershed Management Organizations (WMO) to prepnre <br />watershed plans that nddrc<.<ed wat(:r quality issues. Under this legislation each WMO is to prepnre <br />a plan that states objectives and policies for wntec quality and identifies slternatives for improving <br />water quality and methods of implementation. These pbns are to be reviewed by the Metropolitan <br />Council 'in the same manner and with the same authority and effect as provided for the council's <br />review of the comprehensive plans of local government units' (Minnesota Statutes, section 103B.2~1 <br />subd. 8 (1 <Y'.tO)). The Council is required to determine whether the watershed plan con[ont1$ with the <br />mllnngement objectives and t:lrget pollution IOilds staled in the COlJncil's waler resources plan <br />prepared pursuant to Minne.lota Statutes, section ~73.157. <br />