My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 07-30-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 07-30-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:43 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:36:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA <br />SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING, PAVEMENT MAGEMENT MEETING <br />JUNE 25, 2001 <br />6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Dennis Probst called to order the special <br />City Council meeting at 6:33 p.m. <br /> <br />Present: <br /> <br />Mayor Dennis Probst, Councihnembers Beverly Aplikowski, David Grant, <br />Gregg Larson, Lois Rem, City Administrator Joe Lynch, City Engineer <br />Greg Brown, BRW, Interim Public Works Director and Parks & <br />Recreation Director Thomas Moore, and Recording Secretary, Nancy <br />Czajkowski.. <br /> <br />Absent: <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />DISSCUSSION <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch explained the Public Improvement process and noted they would have to start the <br />neighborhood meetings next month in order to have a street project this year. He noted Council <br />could possibly do a smaller project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson noted he was not in favor of a small proj ect since they would still need to <br />come to a consensus on the issues. Councilmember Grant concurred and noted the issue should <br />be, "do they need to do project?" <br /> <br />Discussion followed on the particular smaller projects that might be possible. Mayor Probst <br />noted the issue goes back to a neighborhood approach versus a worst first approach. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem noted one of the significant factors to consider would be to avoid leaving a <br />cul-de-sac off a main street to be completed later, which by redoing would damage the work <br />done on the main street. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if they could divide neighborhoods into smaller pieces, so they <br />could do the worst first, without land locking them or doing some roads prematurely. He noted <br />good judgment, planning and good engineering was needed. He added they should consider how <br />much variability there was from the worst road to the best road. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated they need to first discuss standards to be agreed on before discussion <br />of PC I ratings and drainage issues. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson concurred with Councilmember Rem and noted they had to look at all of <br />the factors. He stated they needed to decide on the important criteria and then exercise good <br />judgment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant agreed that there needs to be an objective set of criteria to go by and they <br />need to inform the neighborhoods. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.