My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 10-15-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 10-15-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:43 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:37:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />-- <br /> <br />Case #01-25, Guidant Corporation <br />October 9,2001 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A full size version of the map has also been attached. Based on the visibility information provided <br />by the California Institute of Technology, the proposed water tower signage would be visible from <br />1000 feet making the signage readable from Lexington Avenue. Since the two visibility resources <br />are in conflict, the applicant has graciously agreed to simulate the signage on the property. <br />Sometime late next week or early the week after, "mock" signage similar to what is being proposed <br />will be placed on the water tower to illustrate the visibility from certain areas. This information will <br />be provided at the October 29,2001 Council meeting. <br /> <br />Variance Criteria <br /> <br />For your reference, one of the following findings needs to be made to grant a variance to the sign <br />ordinance: <br /> <br />1. Hardship. That the hardship is attributable to the particular physical surroundings, <br />topographical conditions, or shape ofthe specific parcel ofland involved; or <br /> <br />2. Materially Detrimental. That the granting of the variance would not be materially <br />detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity <br />or zone the property is located. <br /> <br />Planninl!' Commission Recommendation <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />With regard to the water tower signage, the Commission voted 3-2 to approve a variance for the <br />water tower for the following reason and following condition: <br /> <br />1. The opportunity for wall signage on the water tower is created by the unique presence of a <br />water tower structure on the site which would create a hardship not to exploit, the impact of <br />the variance would be internal to this extensive campus stretching from Ham1ine to <br />Lexington, and the signs permitted by the variance can be implemented with no material <br />impacts on surrounding uses. <br /> <br />2. The color of the letters on the water tower be painted black, and the tower be non- <br />illuminated. <br /> <br />Minutes highlighting the Planning Commission's discussion can be found with the Sign Ordinance <br />memo. <br /> <br />- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.