Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10/12/01 FRI 10:06 FAX 612 624 7351 <br /> <br />MN lISLS <br /> <br />\1] 002 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Dat.e: <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Re: <br /> <br />MEMORJ\NDUM <br /> <br />October 12, 2001 <br /> <br />Arden Hills City Council <br /> <br />Lois ~.ern <br /> <br />City cf Arden Hills Code of Ordinances <br /> <br />Here is a list of questions and comments based on my reading of <br />the Code. Please note that I have not listed any of the numerous <br />errors in punctuation and grammar, <br /> <br />Chapter 1 <br />Page <br />1-14 120.03, Subd.1,2: Why state penalties here-- these are <br />statutory misdemeanor and petty penalties. <br /> <br /> Chapter <br /> 2-3 <br /> 2-5 <br /> 2-11 <br />. 2-12 <br /> Chapter <br /> 3-7 <br /> 3-18 <br /> 3-56 <br /> 3-63 <br /> 3-76 <br /> 3-98 <br /> 3-103 <br /> 3-106 <br /> 3-114 <br /> 3-118 <br /> 3-122 <br /> 3-132 <br /> Chapter <br /> 7-2 <br />. 7-17 <br /> 10/12/01 <br /> <br />2 <br />Shouldn't this include ~confirmationff that vote was *not* <br />received in person at precinct? <br />subd.2: Note "whether or not a quorum is present" <br />subd.2: subd.3 & 4 appear to be subsections of this Subd. <br />subd.4: See the note following this. Are other ResOlutions <br />similarly inserted into this code, This is the only one so <br />noted; I know there are others. <br /> <br />3 <br />310.01: Final line should state, "as found in the fee <br />resolution appendix" (cf 310.03) <br />9. References to subpart 5 seem contradictory. <br />A.l: Zoning district. Something seems to be missing(sense <br />between paragraph A and this section 1.) <br />c, Line 3: "interested parties has h1:rd, within five. .." <br />7: Should be "or" instead of \'and"? <br />Subd 2: Nhy.include fine amounts instead of referring to fee <br />appendix or state statute? <br />F.5: Line end should be "or" instead of "and." <br />R. "Five-Year Project Plan" refers to... (unless diagram is <br />included in code). <br />RR. '''I'wo'-Year Project Plan" refers to... (see 3-l06). <br />E,r: Do both of these paragraphs follow from (D): The city <br />may requJre a copy of..."? Otherwise they make nO sense. If <br />they follow from D, they should be subordinate to it. <br />Subd.2: Insert "orlf ["No person may excavate 9!: obstruct..... ") <br />Subd.3: Director-- is this term defined? Do we want to use <br />it here ~no elsewhere? <br /> <br />7 <br />700.04: Does this include current changes re buoys on Lake <br />Johanna? <br />Subd. 7: Sentence "... mailing thereof. The notices ..." <br /> <br />- 1 <br />