Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNClL- SEPTEMBER 10,2001 <br /> <br /> <br />;:c,,;pc~ <br />~ <br />9 <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion <br />to approve the 2001 Capital Improvement Plan expenditure as recommended by <br />Staff. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />B. Ramsey County Sheriff's Department, 2002 Operating Budget Approval <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch explained the proposed budget. He noted there was one change on page 5 in the <br />budget estimate for investigators. He added the change reflected the phase in of the fifth <br />investigator. He stated the city's share of the cost savings would be about $2,500. He noted the <br />Contractor Community Group suggested this change. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to approve the proposed 2002 Law Enforcement Contract with a <br />contribution of Arden Hills in the amount of $644,774.02. The motion carried <br />unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />C. Resolution #01-16, Clarifying Proposed Sums of Money to be Levied for Levy Year <br />2001, Payable in 2002 <br /> <br />Mr. Post explained this item needs to be addressed this evening to get the preliminary levy in to <br />the county by September 15, 2001. He stated the levy could go down, but could not go up once <br />this preliminary levy was approved. He noted that in looking at the material from the <br />Department of Revenue, the implicit price deflator used in setting the limit was 3.36% rather <br />than the 2.8% in previous levy discussions. He added the city received HACA funds from two <br />sources: primarily state aid certified HACA, and in the form of manufactured home HACA to a <br />limited extent. He stated the city was trying to restore the lost HACA funds from manufactured <br />homes HACA and the certified HACA funds from the Department of Revenue. He noted the <br />city never receives 100% of the levy so they use a delinquency factor. <br /> <br />He added he recommended the city council consider an 8.69% increase over the certified 2001 <br />amount. He stated the city would still be under the levy limitation. He noted this compared to <br />earlier discussion of a levy increase of 7.5%. He added he did a quick telephone survey of the <br />neighboring communities. He stated Arden Hills and Maplewood were relatively low. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if those amounts had been approved. Mr. Post responded the <br />amounts listed were what the finance directors were using in their latest submission to their <br />council. He stated they were preliminary. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked what the maximum amount of the levy could be. Mr. Post <br />responded the maximum city levy increase could be 12.8 percent. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated it would be nice to publicize that. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to approve Resolution 01-16. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br />