Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Local Government Preparation for Bioterrorist Acts <br /> <br />(A resource prepared by the Public Entity Risk Institute. September 27,2001.) <br /> <br />The events of September 11,2001 brought home to many of us the reality that massive <br />terrorist attacks can occur on American soil. The attacks and subsequent media <br />speculation about the future have caused many citizens to seriously contemplate Ihe <br />possibility of biological or chemical terrorism in Ihis country, This possibility was <br />already under consideration and analysis by various governmental and nongovernmental <br />organizations, which have been working to assess the threat, our state of readiness, and <br />what we can do to improve our ability to respond to such incidents, Consequently, there <br />is substantial information available on the Inlernet aboul the risks of biological or <br />chemical terrorism, and the potential actions Ihat local governmenls can take to address <br />this issue. The purpose of this article is to identify some basic actions local governments <br />can take to address the risk of biological terrorism, and to provide links to resources that <br />provide additional information, Allhough the discussion focuses on biological terrorism, <br />many ofthe resources identified also provide information on chemical terrorism, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />It is tempting to assume that the federal government will protecl our communities from <br />biological terrorist acts through intelligence and other defensive activilies, This is not <br />practical, however, given the size and open characteristics of American society, Local <br />governments need to participate in keeping their communities as safe as possible, The <br />difficulties of disseminating biological agents to the entire populalion of a city via its <br />water supply or contamination of Ihe open air are discussed in some of the resources <br />below, While such mass attacks should be considered, the release of biological agents in <br />a smaller area, such as large building ventilation or water systems, or areas where the <br />public is gathered inside, such as schools, shopping centers, or sporting, cultural and <br />other public events, may be more feasible. Chemical and Biological Terrorism: The <br />Threat According to the Open Literature, Ron Purver, Canadian Security Intelligence <br />Service, 1995. <br /> <br />Local governments can encourage the managers of potentially vulnerable sites to secure <br />and limit access to ventilation and water systems, and provide public event security <br />personnel who have been lrained to recognize Ihe signs of a possible biological terrorist <br />attack. They can take similar actions in public buildings, The local governmenl can also <br />educate citizens to be alert, and to report to the proper aUlhorities potential problem <br />behaviors that they observe, such as attempts to gain unauthorized access to secured <br />areas, These are just examples of actions local governments can take 10 manage Ihe risk <br />of a biological terrorist attack in Iheir community, Each community's risks will be <br />different, To identify and manage these risks, a local government should follow the basic <br />risk management process of identifying the cornmunity's most likely vulnerabilities, <br />evaluating its options for addressing those exposures within the bounds of the law, <br />choosing the best options, and implementing those options. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The response to a biological terrorist attack is in many ways very similar to the response <br />to a naturally occurring epidemic. The initial damage caused by a successful biological <br />