My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-14-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 11-14-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:50 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:37:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION _ NOVEMBER 19, 2001 Df~ A FT <br /> <br />", <br /> <br />Proposed Technolol!v Poliev <br />Mr. Parrish stated that due to the technology upgrades at the City Hall, a need for a <br />Technology Policy has been established. Mr. Parrish noted the Technology Policy <br />mainly addresses liability issues for the City and governs specific use for certain items. <br />Mr. Parrish indicated the policy basically states to use common sense since all activities <br />are monitored, and it outlines acceptable uses. Mr. Lynch noted a draft policy has been <br />distributed to all employees and a meeting was held to review this policy as welL <br /> <br />Staff was directed to include this on the Consent Calendar at the December 10 meeting. <br /> <br />Review of Emerl!encv Operations Plan (EOP) <br />Mr. Lynch noted he reviewed the Cily's EOP based on information he received on how to <br />review these plans. Mr. Lyneh's comments are on Page three (3) of the handout, with Ihe <br />most immediate underlined. He noted this building was built with the express purpose of <br />running on a mobile emergency generator in the event of an emergeney. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst reeommended that either the City Administrator or delegated slaffreview <br />the EOP and make a recommendation on whether it can be completed by city Staff or if a <br />task force should be appointed. . <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Maintenance and Operations Superintendent Position <br />Mr. Lynch indicated he had previously approached the City Council regarding the <br />Maintenance and Operations Superintendent Position and was requested to provide an <br />organizational structure to depict his proposed plans. Mr. Lynch said he spoke with Jim <br />Perron, current Public Works Foreman, who indicated his desire to move into this new <br />position, but there was coneern over the speed of implementation. Mayor Probst asked if <br />Jim Perron would be willing to move into the position at a lower salary now with <br />potential adjustments to the salary pending Labor Relations Assoeiates review of Pay <br />Equity Points compliance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant noted he is concerned we are not moving forward with Ihe new <br />organizational structure formally. He also noted he would like to see what the [mancial <br />impact of this new organizational structure will be. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch indicated he would have the Labor Relations Associates draft job descriptions <br />by Monday, November 27,2001. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski noted she believes a probationary period was needed for Jim <br />Perron's new position. Councilmember Larson agreed. <br /> <br />Staff was directed to include this item on the Consent Calendar at the December 10 <br />meeting and proceed with hiring Mr. Perron pending the salary informalion from Labor <br />Relations Associates. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2002 Committee Assil!nment Process <br />No information was presenled on this item. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.