My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-14-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 11-14-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:50 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:37:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />NOU~29~2001 12:00 <br /> <br />EPW <br /> <br />512 ]7] 5525 P.Ol/0l <br /> <br />URS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Thre~her Square <br />700 Third Sl1e~t $oulh <br />Minne"DOIi,. MN 55415 <br />Phone: (612) 370.0700 <br />Pax: (612) 370-1378 <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Aaron Parrish, <br />Ardcn Hill City Planner <br /> <br />Copy: Greg Brown, URS File: 37951-005-2001 <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Nick Landwer, PE <br /> <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br /> <br />November 29, 2001 <br />County Road 0 and Cleveland Avenue Site Plan, Plan Review <br /> <br />I have reviewed the site plan for the proposed development on the northeast comer of the <br />intersection of County Road D and Cleveland A venue. Following are my comments: <br /> <br />1. It appears there could be potential drainage problems with the drainage/grading design. The <br />proposed drainage design has substantial amount of site runoff flowing from the driveway <br />entrances into County Road 0 and Cleveland A venue. Runoff from the site into the <br />roadways should be limited by modifying the proposed grade or by adding catchbasins. <br /> <br />There is also a concern of pOlential flooding of the properties to the nonh from the site runoff <br />via the ditch on the nonh side of the property. An alternative collection area could be a swale <br />in the boulevard at the intersection comer with an outlet piped to the existing Slonnsewer. <br /> <br />The developer should submit existing and proposed drainagc calculations for the site runoff <br />to the City Engineer for review. <br /> <br />2. Rice Creek Watershed DiSlfiet will require the developer to apply for a drainage pennit and <br />provide for stormwater runoff treatmcnt. <br /> <br />3. The developer should submit a derailed utility plan. <br /> <br />4. Details are not clear on the heights of the proposed retaining walls. Some of the taller <br />sections of wall will require safety railings. <br /> <br />5. The proposed area drain in the lower level will be required to drain into the storm drainage <br />system. A detail of the connection should be included in rhe utility plan. It appears that a <br />sump pump will be required for this drain. This shall not be connected to the sanitary sewer <br />serVIce. <br /> <br />6. The ramp on rhe west side of the proposed building is very st(:ep at 12.75%. This ramp <br />should not be used for public access. <br /> <br />TOTAL P.Ol <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.