Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 9, 2001 <br /> <br />o <br />,) <br /> <br />\1r. Tolaas indicatcd most of the city's cost would be in the shoulder work. He stated there was a <br />minor amount of stonn sewer work and some ponding required. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked if this was a commitment to funding or just approval of a concept. Mr. <br />Tolaas responded it was just approval of a concept for the RFP. He stated the cost sharing <br />agreement would come later. He noted this was a low cost solution to the problems there. He <br />added they had cropped things back to the real problem. He stated once the arsenal site was <br />developed, this project could come back into the County's program at any time to change the <br />work. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked about the long-term plan for Lexington Avenue. Mr. Tolaas responded it <br />would be alternative three in the report. He stated there was strong opposition to the <br />environmental impact of a straight on alignment. He noted state law requires them to safeguard <br />the wetlands at all costs. He added when the project comes back under consideration there might <br />be room to talk about it again. He stated this was a good solution to buy the County those years. <br />He noted that in the scheme of things it was a low cost solution to a significant problem. He <br />stated when the arsenal site was developed the environmental arguments would not be as strong. <br />He noted a land bridge option could work. He added it could still allow the passage of water and <br />turtles. He stated there was also the issue of a relative high cost to cross the marsh now when <br />there was no need for it. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a motion to <br />approve Alternative 3 in the Ramsey County Project Development Report for <br />County Road I from Hamlin Avenue to Lexington Avenue. The motion carricd <br />unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />B. Pavement Management Plan (PMP) Standards <br /> <br />1. Definition of "Neighborhood" Street Width <br />2. Standards Map <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch explained the Pavement Management Plan and the Standards Map, He noted there <br />was no agreement yet on the designation of width for a neighborhood street. He added three <br />options had been proposed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson suggested the following changes: <br /> <br />I. On page 2 of recommendation, in Additional Considerations for Street Width <br />Determination, add "presence or absence of sidewalk" after "Existing trees". <br /> <br />2, On page 3, in the first large paragraph, in the last sentence, change the "options provided <br />for selection would include" to "options provided for selection could include". <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />On page 3, under Process, in the first paragraph, replace the first sentence with "The City <br />of Arden Hills would use a variety of media sources to notify the neighborhood about the <br />intended roadway project". <br />