Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br />EN HILLS <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: Joe Lynch, City Administrator <br /> <br /> <br />FROM: Terrance Post, City Accountant @!) <br /> <br /> <br />SUBJECT: 2002 Budget Discussion Items <br /> <br />DATE: December 14,2001 <br /> <br />Staff would encourage Council discussion and/or direction on the following proposed 2002 <br />budget items at the December 17, 2001, Council Worksession bearing in mind that a later <br />December 17, 2001, Special Council Meeting agenda item includes the adoption of2002 budget. <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Mavor and Council Department No. 41100 of General Fund No. 101- Miscellaneous <br />Community Events (AlC No. 4900). <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski has questioned whether the proposed $10,000 budgeted <br />expenditure will be adequate to fund remaining 50th Celebration activities and a <br />separate 2002 event (i.e" successor to the "Day in the Park" prior to year 2002 <br />activity). <br /> <br />2. Park Maintenance Department No, 45200 of the General Fund No. 101 - Other <br />Equipment (AlC No. 5400). <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson communicated the wishes of the Parks, Trails, and Recreation <br />Committee (PTRC) to replace the Freeway Park and Hazelnut Park warming houses <br />as part of the 2002 capital budget. The proposed $70,000 budgeted expenditure does <br />not include these two items. What is included in the proposed budget are <br />replacements for vehicle #13 (a 1995 pickup with a $42,000 replacement cost) and <br />equipment item #49 (a 1995 Grounds Master with blower at a replacement cost of <br />$28,000). The PTRC did not identify a project cost or recommend a funding source. <br /> <br />As posted out in the December 6, 2001, City Accountant overview memo for the <br />December 10, 2001, Truth in Taxation Hearing, staff expectations are that the <br />"wants" of the Parks strategic planning effort will exceed identifiable resources such <br />that individual projects will need to be costed and prioritized by the City Council. In <br />the absence of the results of this exercise, it is difficult to determine how these two <br />warming house replacement projects would rank. <br />