Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />MARCH 25, 2002 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmcmber Grant moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />friendly amendment to number three stating "a complete evaluation on the <br />condition of Benton way as it related to Waldon Place and Hunters Court". <br />Councilmember Rem accepted Councilmember Grant's friendly amendment. <br />Amendment carried 3-2 (Probst and Larson). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst requested correspondence be sent to residents along Benton Way as to why borings <br />were going to be done. Councilmember Rem stated this had already been done. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated this was not a neighborhood project; these were two small cul-de- <br />sacs and while it was the intention of giving a year's notice for large projects, he did not see this <br />as a large project. He stated he did not see that any information obtained about Benton Way in <br />the feasibility report would influence what the decision was for Waldon Place and Hunters Court. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked the City Engineer how long Benton Way would last before <br />reconstruction was recommended. The City Engineer replied 3-8 years. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated if it was three years and the residents were willing to wait, and then <br />nothing should be done at this time, but ifit was eight years, then this needed to be looked at. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated it was the City's policy to give a year notice, and this was not done <br />in this case. She stated these residents were given too short of a notice. . <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson pointed out if they did not do Waldon Place and Hunters Court at this <br />time, this would push off other neighborhood projects also. He expressed frustration that the <br />Council could not make decisions and stick with them. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he supported the feasibility study, but was not going to support the <br />amendment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated this was different in some ways because they had 100 percent <br />resident concern regarding the reconstruction. She stated the Council was committed to doing <br />something this year and she did not believe a couple of borings on Benton Way would throw the <br />neighborhood into chaos. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated only three of the sixteen residents were in attendance at tonight's meeting, <br />and he would want additional resident's opinions before he would assume all of the residents had <br />agreed to a double project/assessment plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated it was their job to listen to the residents and then make the best <br />decision for the City. He stated they should be looking at option numbers one and two. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if boring samples on Benton Way were taken, would that give them . <br />further information if Benton Way would stand up to reconstruction of the cul-de-sacs. The City <br />Engineer stated they would be able to determine what was below the surface area, and if Benton <br />