My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-08-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 04-08-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:55 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:01:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />MARCH 25, 2002 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he believed the City needed to do a better job with following up <br />on seal coating after making improvements. He indicated some streets had not been seal coated. <br />He also indicated they needed to be sensitive to property owners on corner lots due to assessment <br />Issues. <br /> <br />John Tholen, 1 I 43 Waldon Place, stated he believed they should just overlay both of the cul-de- <br />sacs. He indicated he did not believe they were in bad condition. He stated Benton Way should <br />be seal coated if they were doing anything. He stated there were two cul-de-sacs with minimal <br />housing, and they only had garbage trucks on the street. <br /> <br />Cliff Bujold, 1134 Hunters Court, stated in 1995 when the Council entertained the possibilities <br />of doing street overlays of Benton Way there were residents from Hunters Court and Waldon <br />Place who had asked for the streets to also be overlaid, but were denied. He stated the residents <br />had not been heard. He indicated if the overlay had occurred in 1995, they would not be here <br />today. He stated he was concerned about damage to Benton Way if there were heavy trucks <br />going over Benton Way to get to the cul-de-sacs. He stated there may be a lot of damage to <br />Benton Way with the truck traffic. He stated he believed this City also needed to have an <br />established street maintenance program. He indicated he believed Council operated in a crisis <br />management mode when it comes to street maintenance. He believed the overlay would allow <br />the resident's time until Benton Way needed to be reconstructed. He asked that the City do the <br />whole neighborhood at one time. He stated he believed an overlay was best at this time, until the <br />entire neighborhood could be reconstructed. He urged Council to also seal-coat Benton Way at <br />this time. <br /> <br />Gary Drewa, 1141 Hunters Court, stated if a reconstruction of Waldon Place and Hunters Court <br />is done, the residents would be displaced for three months, and if they waited to do Benton Way <br />at a future time, they would be displaced again because they could not reach their cul-de-sacs <br />when Benton Way was under reconstruction. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked for the estimate of the overlay. The City Engineer replied it was <br />about $40,000 - $50,000 combined, with $195,000 for reconstruction, both including engineering <br />and contractor costs. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated one of the resident's concems at the public meeting was her family <br />had just contracted to put an addition to their house this summer, which would lead to more <br />traffic and if they had received more notice, they would have changed their plans. She stated the <br />residents would appreciate more notice for proj ects such as these. <br /> <br />The City Engineer stated the disturbance where there was actual dirt and dust would be 3-4 <br />weeks. The residents would not be displaced for three months. He stated there were certainly <br />inconveniences, but the residents would always be able to get to their driveways. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked if it was okay with the residents in attendance at tonight's <br />meeting to essentially be assessed twice if they did the overlay and then did the reconstruction at <br />a future date. The residents in attendance at tonight's meeting stated they were in support of this <br />approach. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.