My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-12-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 11-12-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:59 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:02:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />It <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />,. <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br />~HILLS <br /> <br />Ingerson Neighborhood Q&A <br />Pavement Management Meeting (PMP) <br />July 18, 2002; 7:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Page 5 of8 <br /> <br />Comment: Other cities use independent firms to do their ratings. Why don't we do so as well? <br />Yes, it is true some cities to hirc independent firms to perform their road ratings. Not all <br />cities do this however. The City has decided they are comfortable with their engineer's <br />credibility. <br /> <br />Comment: Is it not true that this need for road improvement in our neighborhood is based on the <br />opinion of the engineer which may not be the same opinion as the residents. Maybe a less <br />pristine road would be safer because speed bumps could then be added and people would <br />probably drive slower. Please stop URS opinion statements and base your recommendations on <br />facts. <br />The engineering judgment is based on facts and science as well. We are here to explain <br />why this is our opinion and have a discussion with residents. URS has been hired to take on the <br />global responsibility to take care of the City. <br /> <br />Comment: As a resident, it is our responsibility as well to take care of the City. As an engineer <br />you are in a position where you can sway people based on your expertise and experience. <br />Two years ago this project was tabled because of resident opinions. These meetings are <br />set up to hear resident opinions. <br /> <br />Comment: According to the pavement index, in seems some roads are going downward in <br />ratings rather quickly. Some of these roads see very little traffic. <br />These ratings are being used as a tool and are not the only factor being used. <br /> <br />If it was done in 88, if we did an overlay now and put in a serpentine ditch wouldn't water still <br />improved just as much as a total reconstruction. <br />There are still some parts that would not allow water to get ditched as it should to collect <br />water. There are some exceptions. And no it is absolutely not required to redo the road today. <br />We could do something to a lesser degree to improve water quality. <br /> <br />Comment: It seems that natural drainage of the area will be problematic. Our yards need to <br />drain into the streets or they will be swamped. Driveways are a concern too. <br />Curbs will get rid of the current ponding on the properties. The top of the curb is <br />generally set at or below the current status of the curb and never goes above or you would <br />create a problem. Driveway aprons would be installed and would prevent any problems <br />with driveways. Five feet of the driveway would be blended in. Ingerson is currently flat <br />and would not foresee any problems there. A profile is drawn on each individual <br />driveway and grading is checked. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.