Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,. <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br />~LS <br /> <br />Ingerson Neighborhood Q&A <br />Pavement Management Meeting (pMP) <br />July 18, 2002; 7:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Page 7 of8 <br /> <br />Comment: Has there been a recent water quality report completed and what are the numbers? <br />There has not been a report since last December. We will make sure the most recent <br />report will be available on the City's website. The most recent report did say the City's <br />measures were inadequate and attention should be given to that. There have been some <br />improvements but not was anticipated by DNR. Part of that is being addressed with <br />Council and steps are being taken. <br /> <br />Comment: Did that most recent report recommend a vortex chamber? <br />It did not get specific in any oue area. This can be an option for future discussion. <br /> <br />Comment: Many people on the lake have their own easement which is Fernwood channel. The <br />area association wrote a letter to the Mayor asking him to look at some way to treat the water. <br />Rice Creek Watershed performed a watershed reconnaissance of Lake Josephine which <br />indicated it should be treated. The City of Roseville has been working to clean up their side and <br />nOw Arden Hills must do the same. <br /> <br />Comment: It stated on the University of Minnesota website the #1 pollutant is the grass and <br />leaves decomposing bringing forth phosphorous. Any time water is speeded up it is going to <br />bring up the level of phosphorous into the lake. <br />All water tends to get to the lake the same way. If you have run-off it gets to the catch <br />basins and then to lake eventually. This is an opportunity to build a pond to meet NERP <br />goals. By building a pond of a certain size you can expect to catch a larger percentage of <br />pollutants. In general, the past resident consensus was to do minimal work at the <br />Fernwood channel. <br /> <br />Comment: If you change the grade so it flows all the way to Hamline why wouldn't you just <br />carry all the water down to Hamline. <br />We did look at that and it is very expensive and uses a very large pipe. The watershed <br />didn't like that option because we were working against the natural flow. The Femwood <br />channel would then become all backwater as well. <br /> <br />Comment: Maybe all the water from Carlton only could go to Hamline and that way you could <br />clean the water going into Josephine adequately. <br />That certainly is a possible option which can be explored. From an engineering point of <br />view it can be done. If Rice Creek is okay with it then we can certainly look at it. <br />