Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN TOWERS1 INC. <br />3440 BAYSIDE ROAD <br />ORONO,IIN 55356 <br />952-473-3660 FAX 952-473-3880 <br /> <br />December 19, 2001 <br /> <br />Mr. Dave Scherbel <br />City Building Official <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Arden Hills, MN 55112 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Scherbel: <br />Enclosed is the Ehresmann Engineering Report with attachments dated December 14, 2001 which <br />we have so long awaited. In addition I am enclosing a copy of a letter from the manufacturer, Rohn <br />Industries and also from Tom Pucci of Motorola. Tom is now a V.P. at Motorola but in 1981 he was the <br />salesman that sold me on the idea of erecting a tower for their use. If you have been following the business <br />news, Motorola is being sued by one of their former employees for about a billion dollars. Due to <br />restrictions placed on him by his legal department, Tom could not address the original antenna arrangement <br />for fear of getting sued again. You can underntand that they are extremely cautious in light of their past <br />experiences. <br />The letters are intended to address the question mised concerning the number of antennas on the <br />tower. The original illustration on the plan approved back in 1981 showed 15 antennas for purposes of <br />illustration. They were all at the highest levels possible, allowing for frequency separation, since that was <br />required of the technology at that time. David Brinker, V. P. of Engineering at Rohn Industries indicates in <br />his letter that the loading shown indicates the minimum strength requirements, meaning that the tower, as <br />originally designed, could possibly accommodate more antennas if a structural analysis determines that to <br />be possible. He also told me verbally that antennas at the higher level place more stress on the tower than <br />the same antennas spread more evenly down the tower. Some of those factors are the weight of the longer <br />coaxial cables and also the wind velocity at higher levels. The structma1 analysis attached hereto indicates <br />that the tower with the present loading meets TIAlEIA-222-F with y," ice loading hased upon reducing the <br />height by 80 feet and making a minor modification to one guy wire. It doesn't appear that it is necessary to <br />do anything further regarding that matter if it can be agreed that the antenna array originally shown was for <br />illustration and an indication of the tower's minimum strength requested at point of design. <br />We have scheduled all modifications identified in the Ehresmann report to be completed by Dietz <br />Brothers Tower Company of Spicer/New London as soon as possible. Alan Dietz advised me that weather <br />permitting they would do it as soon as possible after January I since they are booked until that time. They <br />will require five to six days of good weather, meaning temperatures above 20 degrees and very low wind. <br />I trust that this meets with your approval. If there are any unanswered questions or if you need <br />additional information please contact me and I will do my best to provide it. Thank you for all of your <br />effort concerning this matter. With your help, I believe we have come to a reasonable conclusion. <br /> <br />Sin'!7ly, / <br />".' / j/ <br />.::'/ / <br />/' (.,/ ,,?'}\. . <br />Dan Vaughan <br />President <br /> <br />y <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />-- <br />