My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 01-28-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 01-28-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:02 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:02:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />NOVEMBER 26, 2001 <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />well. He added this is a large parcel. He stated if they dropped the density they could <br />shorten the road and might reduce the costs. He noted he was not prepared to move on <br />this concept plan. He added he would be open to some type ofrevision. He stated he <br />shared Councilmember Aplikowski's concerns about the road. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he served on the Planning Commission prior to being on the <br />Council. He noted it was his recollection that there were options for access. He added <br />that for reasons not recalled the owners chose not to pursue them. He stated that in <br />hindsight, the city should have taken action here and identified a paper street for <br />access to these points. He noted there has been a fairly steadfast attempt to avoid flag <br />lots. He added they have attempted to avoid private streets. He stated that in the <br />instances private streets have been approved they have been for one or two properties <br />only. He noted he had significant concerns about the five lots, their utilities, and the <br />service of emergency vehicles. He added this neighborhood does have water <br />problems. He stated the City has had to make a number of corrections. He noted that <br />too much is trying to happen here. He added he would not support creating this <br />number of properties on a private street. He stated that in addition to street <br />corrections, there would also be two driveways. He noted those driveways would need <br />to come off the street and enforce the idea that it needs to be public. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated her biggest concern was that as presented the maximum <br />number of lots. She noted there is going to have to be a real street there. She added <br />she really had misgivings about the street going onto Hamlinee Avenue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated there are already traffic problems there. She noted <br />adding five homes would not increase the traffic significantly. She added the traffic <br />was not a big issue here, but the size of the road was an issue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked when the applicants could come back with a revised <br />plan. He questioned whether it would be better to table the matter and let them come <br />back. <br /> <br />Mr. Parrish stated the zoning ordinance indicates that the applicant can come back in <br />six months. He noted he would suggest a new application. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated if the plan changed substantially the applicants could come in <br />tomorrow with new fee. He asked about the applicant withdrawing the application. <br />Mr. Parrish responded if they withdrew the application, anything new would be a new <br />application. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked the applicants why they wanted to do this. Mr. <br />Goserud responded it is a large piece of property to maintain. He stated they were <br />looking for a smaller property in the future for retirement. He noted they would be <br />selling the property. He added they feel it is a parcel that can be divided. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.