My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 01-28-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 01-28-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:02 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:02:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />DECEMBER 10,2001 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />make the meeting. He stated he also received a mailing for the National Association of <br />Installation Developers Conference. He noted there is a conference in January on the <br />development of former military installations. He added the Council might want someone to <br />attend this conference. He stated another issue would be funding for the public works building, <br />He noted the Council did not budget for that project. He added the Council needed to discuss <br />possible funding options. He stated Mr. Lynch had noted the County was looking at proceeding <br />on a design build format He noted the City cannot do that. He added there are a number of <br />decisions that need to be made so the Council needs to set aside some time to discuss them. He <br />stated the 35W Corridor Coalition has established assessment rates. He noted the Council needs <br />to take formal action on that activity. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch explained the options for the City to consider with regard to Ramsey County. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated the City should be a full partner with the County. He noted if not there <br />would be some issues. He asked the Councilmembers to consider it. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson agreed. He stated ifthe City does not communicate to Ramsey County <br />the City's expectations, it would be get whatever the County comes up with. He noted that by the <br />time the City sees the design it would be too late to do anything. He added one concemwould be <br />that the building be screened appropriately and have a low profile. He stated they did not want to <br />see usual equipment yards. He noted the City should come up with some general statements . <br />about what it would like to see. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated the City is in a strong position because under the current zoning this would <br />not be an acceptable use. He noted while the state and federal govenunents could go on their own <br />without City approval, the County could not. He added it would be better for the City to be a <br />partner. He stated staff should draft some proposed statements. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated those statements could be ready for the meeting on December 17, <br />2001. He noted the City could have a joint meeting with the County during one ofthe <br />worksessions in February. He added it would give the Operations and Finance Committee the <br />chance to meet prior to the joint meeting. He stated he thought that face to face negotiations on <br />an ongoing basis would be better. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski concurred. She stated she thought it might be better if the Council <br />attends one of the County's meetings. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated the Council should still put something on paper to document the <br />design issues. He noted there are things about which the County would not be sensitive. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he would like the Council to be active in the selection process of the design <br />team. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant agreed that Arden Hills should put together some guiding principals. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.